Thread
:
Economy vs. ecology in capitalism
View Single Post
04-27-2009, 06:36 PM
#
13
JANALA
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
I´ll jump over my own shadow, in reply to this, despite the fact, that style of writing still is beyond all common courtesy.
About the 0 growth, 0 rate of return: If i have profits, and am not allowed to reinvest them (in which case, theoretically, Growth = 0, RoR > 0), i´d have to consume it all. This is buying power, that did not exist prior to the investment though, and how am i gonna consume it, without the need for growth elsewhere - i am sure you heard of the ´say-theorem´ - any production will generate new demand (and with it growth).
I dont say, and never did, that ´evil capitalists´ are forcing anything. In fact, i think they are as much victim of the system as most other people as well. I am not one of those people, who pushes the blame for the defects of capitalism on a certain group of people, like the Nazis did on the Jews after the pre-recent crisis and many people tend to do today with managers and bankers today.
I will now provide you with a set of vocab, which you seem to be lacking:
- ´I do not agree´ - means in your language: ´you are retarded´
- ´This is a rediculous, easily debunkable claim, because... [insert debunkment here]´ - this equals the laughing smilie you like to use
- ´very [much]´, ´strongly´ etc. - vulgo: ****ing
I dont claim to be infailable - you can see that in post #5. I merely want to discuss stuff - this is not about my ego. How about you adopt this posture, for as long as we talk, at least?
Quote
JANALA
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JANALA
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
04:36 PM
.