DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**JeorgeNoxeref** · 04-27-2009, 07:03 PM

I´ll jump over my own shadow, in reply to this, despite the fact, that style of writing still is beyond all common courtesy.

Boo hoo.

bout the 0 growth, 0 rate of return: If i have profits, and am not allowed to reinvest them (in which case, theoretically, Growth = 0, RoR > 0), i´d have to consume it all. This is buying power, that did not exist prior to the investment though, and how am i gonna consume it, without the need for growth elsewhere

I have no idea what you're trying to say here.

Does this make any sense to ANYBODY?

- i am sure you heard of the ´say-theorem´ - any production will generate new demand (and with it growth).

?

I dont say, and never did, that ´evil capitalists´ are forcing anything. In fact, i think they are as much victim of the system as most other people as well. I am not one of those people, who pushes the blame for the defects of capitalism on a certain group of people, like the Nazis did on the Jews after the pre-recent crisis and many people tend to do today with managers and bankers today.

Bunch of useless nonsense. The point is that you're claiming that marketing drives growth and this is done BECAUSE capitalism needs growth in order to survive. Both claims are silly

I will now provide you with a set of vocab, which you seem to be lacking:

- ´I do not agree´ - means in your language: ´you are retarded´

No. When I say "you're retarded" it's because I've pointed out an error (not a difference in opinion) more than one time and you still persist in maintaining your mistaken position.

´This is a rediculous, easily debunkable claim, because... [insert debunkment here]´ - this equals the laughing smilie you like to use

Laughter suffices for most of what you post.

- ´very [much]´, ´strongly´ etc. - vulgo: ****ing

I like swearing.

I dont claim to be infailable - you can see that in post #5. I merely want to discuss stuff - this is not about my ego. How about you adopt this posture, for as long as we talk, at least?

I was happy to, until you demonstrated that you're incapable of learning from those who are better informed than yourself.

04-27-2009, 07:03 PM	#14
JeorgeNoxeref Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 369 Senior Member	I´ll jump over my own shadow, in reply to this, despite the fact, that style of writing still is beyond all common courtesy. Boo hoo. bout the 0 growth, 0 rate of return: If i have profits, and am not allowed to reinvest them (in which case, theoretically, Growth = 0, RoR > 0), i´d have to consume it all. This is buying power, that did not exist prior to the investment though, and how am i gonna consume it, without the need for growth elsewhere I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Does this make any sense to ANYBODY? - i am sure you heard of the ´say-theorem´ - any production will generate new demand (and with it growth). ? I dont say, and never did, that ´evil capitalists´ are forcing anything. In fact, i think they are as much victim of the system as most other people as well. I am not one of those people, who pushes the blame for the defects of capitalism on a certain group of people, like the Nazis did on the Jews after the pre-recent crisis and many people tend to do today with managers and bankers today. Bunch of useless nonsense. The point is that you're claiming that marketing drives growth and this is done BECAUSE capitalism needs growth in order to survive. Both claims are silly I will now provide you with a set of vocab, which you seem to be lacking: - ´I do not agree´ - means in your language: ´you are retarded´ No. When I say "you're retarded" it's because I've pointed out an error (not a difference in opinion) more than one time and you still persist in maintaining your mistaken position. ´This is a rediculous, easily debunkable claim, because... [insert debunkment here]´ - this equals the laughing smilie you like to use Laughter suffices for most of what you post. - ´very [much]´, ´strongly´ etc. - vulgo: ****ing I like swearing. I dont claim to be infailable - you can see that in post #5. I merely want to discuss stuff - this is not about my ego. How about you adopt this posture, for as long as we talk, at least? I was happy to, until you demonstrated that you're incapable of learning from those who are better informed than yourself.
	Quote