DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**citalopram** · 02-02-2009, 10:52 PM

IMO seriously yes.
Londo Mollari was well done especially in the later episodes when he was emperor.
Susan Ivanova, enough said,
Vir was always excellent.
G'Kar, agreed.
Michael Garibaldi was also well done.

a lot of the charaters that had smaller parts were also done much better.
A lot of special guests stars in Star Trek (not just DS9) where in because they were famous and not necessarily because they were good actors.

I don't remember too many DS9 guests who were there because they were famous. Despite liking both series a lot, I think the acting was better in DS9.

02-02-2009, 10:52 PM	#18
citalopram Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 553 Senior Member	IMO seriously yes. Londo Mollari was well done especially in the later episodes when he was emperor. Susan Ivanova, enough said, Vir was always excellent. G'Kar, agreed. Michael Garibaldi was also well done. a lot of the charaters that had smaller parts were also done much better. A lot of special guests stars in Star Trek (not just DS9) where in because they were famous and not necessarily because they were good actors. I don't remember too many DS9 guests who were there because they were famous. Despite liking both series a lot, I think the acting was better in DS9.
	Quote