DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**robstamps** · 07-07-2011, 11:02 PM

I There were MANY things connecting Casey to the remains - including human decomposition found in the trunk of a car that only she had control of for 31 days.

really? did you listen to all the testimony? what proof did they have that a HUMAN decomposed in the trunk of that car? assuming (big assumption) it was human, was there evidence that the decomposed human was caylee anthony? the air sampling evidence should not have been allowed in to begin with. it's cool science, neat research but certainly does not adhere to the Daubert standard.

and she wasn't the only one who had control of it for 31 days. it was impounded at some point BEFORE the 31 days between caylee's disappearance and her father picking the car up from impound.

There was no soft tissue remaining anywhere. Her body was underwater for most of the 6 months she was out there due to a hurricane, so all DNA was gone. The duct tape was wrapped around her head and hair. Although the soft tissue disintegrated, the hair did not. It was wound so tightly that her mandible was still attached to the skull in perfect anatomical position. how did they know the body was underwater during most of that time? because the spot where the body was found was under water? hm, if there was a lot of water couldn't the body have moved? it wasn't under water when it was found.

did theys how photos of the skull with the duct tape? my understanding was that it wasn't actually covering the mouth/nose area. that some was across the lower jaw. But i'm just going by descriptions in the press.

Was there any evidence presented to connect the duct tape to Casey Anthony?

Caylee was chloroformed, duct-taped, tossed in a trash-filled swamp, rotted to a skeleton and had her bones chewed on by animals and no one is paying for it. though i certainly have reasonable doubt that she was chloroformed, i agree she was killed (intentionally or accidently, who knows?) and tossed in woods. IMO, what was lacking is evidence that proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Casey is the person responsible.

The 12 jurors obviously felt the same.

07-07-2011, 11:02 PM	#10
robstamps Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 399 Senior Member	I There were MANY things connecting Casey to the remains - including human decomposition found in the trunk of a car that only she had control of for 31 days. really? did you listen to all the testimony? what proof did they have that a HUMAN decomposed in the trunk of that car? assuming (big assumption) it was human, was there evidence that the decomposed human was caylee anthony? the air sampling evidence should not have been allowed in to begin with. it's cool science, neat research but certainly does not adhere to the Daubert standard. and she wasn't the only one who had control of it for 31 days. it was impounded at some point BEFORE the 31 days between caylee's disappearance and her father picking the car up from impound. There was no soft tissue remaining anywhere. Her body was underwater for most of the 6 months she was out there due to a hurricane, so all DNA was gone. The duct tape was wrapped around her head and hair. Although the soft tissue disintegrated, the hair did not. It was wound so tightly that her mandible was still attached to the skull in perfect anatomical position. how did they know the body was underwater during most of that time? because the spot where the body was found was under water? hm, if there was a lot of water couldn't the body have moved? it wasn't under water when it was found. did theys how photos of the skull with the duct tape? my understanding was that it wasn't actually covering the mouth/nose area. that some was across the lower jaw. But i'm just going by descriptions in the press. Was there any evidence presented to connect the duct tape to Casey Anthony? Caylee was chloroformed, duct-taped, tossed in a trash-filled swamp, rotted to a skeleton and had her bones chewed on by animals and no one is paying for it. though i certainly have reasonable doubt that she was chloroformed, i agree she was killed (intentionally or accidently, who knows?) and tossed in woods. IMO, what was lacking is evidence that proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Casey is the person responsible. The 12 jurors obviously felt the same.
	Quote