DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**yqpY4iw6** · 05-29-2008, 10:17 AM

I'm saying that I don't believe he was ignorant of what was going on so he has to consider himself part of the problem. I always find it interesting that people like this don't speak up right away (some say out of loyalty) but as soon as it's time make money off of it, yes it was a scandal of huge proportions so buy my book and read all about it. Yes, some of the things he states have the ring of truth about them, but they would sound a lot more credible if he admitted that he knew something about what was going on at the time. If the man was that stupid that he didn't realize it, the credibility of what he says later is quite suspect.

But I haven't read everything so I'll reserve some judgement but on the surface I'm not going to lap it all up as truth from an insider.

05-29-2008, 10:17 AM	#15
yqpY4iw6 Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 360 Senior Member	I'm saying that I don't believe he was ignorant of what was going on so he has to consider himself part of the problem. I always find it interesting that people like this don't speak up right away (some say out of loyalty) but as soon as it's time make money off of it, yes it was a scandal of huge proportions so buy my book and read all about it. Yes, some of the things he states have the ring of truth about them, but they would sound a lot more credible if he admitted that he knew something about what was going on at the time. If the man was that stupid that he didn't realize it, the credibility of what he says later is quite suspect. But I haven't read everything so I'll reserve some judgement but on the surface I'm not going to lap it all up as truth from an insider.
	Quote