DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**SimSlim** · 01-18-2008, 09:20 PM

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Well duh. It's become a pejorative meaning whatever the person using it doesn't like rather than a foreign policy school of thought. Well double duh.

Even when not used pejoratively it doesn't mean what it originally did.

I want to know if the book to which the OP refers deals with this confuscation of the term or not. If it doesn't, reading about a political philosophy that no longer means what it used to mean isn't going to give much insight into U.S. foreign policy.

Quit being such a....a...DinoDoc

01-18-2008, 09:20 PM	#20
SimSlim Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 503 Senior Member	Originally posted by DinoDoc Well duh. It's become a pejorative meaning whatever the person using it doesn't like rather than a foreign policy school of thought. Well double duh. Even when not used pejoratively it doesn't mean what it originally did. I want to know if the book to which the OP refers deals with this confuscation of the term or not. If it doesn't, reading about a political philosophy that no longer means what it used to mean isn't going to give much insight into U.S. foreign policy. Quit being such a....a...DinoDoc
	Quote