DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Beriilosal** · 08-29-2012, 01:29 PM

but the truly miraculous finding is there is no paternal DNA. Then this would mean the blood did not contain evidence of a Y chromosome. Which means that the blood could not have come from a male, or that the testing was flawed or meaningless. I would also seriously question the ability of a 2000-year-old blood trace in supplying undamaged or undegraded DNA.

08-29-2012, 01:29 PM	#3
Beriilosal Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 468 Senior Member	but the truly miraculous finding is there is no paternal DNA. Then this would mean the blood did not contain evidence of a Y chromosome. Which means that the blood could not have come from a male, or that the testing was flawed or meaningless. I would also seriously question the ability of a 2000-year-old blood trace in supplying undamaged or undegraded DNA.
	Quote