DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**htDgExh8** · 09-09-2006, 09:11 PM

From what I've read, XM seems to be the more stable company and more likely to survive. (many more subscribers, better agreements, higher stock price, Sirius is valued more highly, IIRC) It's the opposite in Canada. XM was projected to be the leader, but Sirius is kicking its ass. XM has responded by raising their rates to match Sirius's $15CDN/mo, but with less channels and some advertising in their music and without NHL this year.

7 out of 10 satellite radios in Canada right now are Sirius.

09-09-2006, 09:11 PM	#3
htDgExh8 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 454 Senior Member	From what I've read, XM seems to be the more stable company and more likely to survive. (many more subscribers, better agreements, higher stock price, Sirius is valued more highly, IIRC) It's the opposite in Canada. XM was projected to be the leader, but Sirius is kicking its ass. XM has responded by raising their rates to match Sirius's $15CDN/mo, but with less channels and some advertising in their music and without NHL this year. 7 out of 10 satellite radios in Canada right now are Sirius.
	Quote