[repldoinfo]

i have a desire to point out how much the negative path is frowned upon in this forum, and that the very frowning is a negative expression. whereas on the other hand i suspect that when people on this forum go out of their way to say that both paths are equally valid they are trying to act wise and tolerant.

ra may say that both paths ultimately lead to the same result, and it may very well be true (i think it is) that the 6d negatives will make a tremendous contribution when they turn positive, evil does not have ultimate existence and requires the good to feed off of and is therefore a less legitimate path, it is negating of life which is the fundamental attribute of the creator and is therefore a less legitimate path, and it is a path of suffering and stolen pleasure, and is therefore a less legitimate path.

i do not think it is at all negative to say this. it is speaking the truth. it is separating positive from negative, which is necessary to see clearly, as seeing clearly is necessary to polarization, at least at the later stages.

i do appreciate how difficult it is to polarize. it goes against the grain, it requires sustained effort and consistency, it doesn't allow one to rest, it requires sacrifice and strength.