Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
The only one of your "race traitors" I agree with here is Micahel Jackson. Everybody else here isn't. ...If you like big noses, big lips, big foreheads, big ears, nappy hair... See, I can make a bigoted statement, too. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
Cardio ---------- Post added 2010-08-02 at 02:06 ---------- Talk about bias. "MJ was a race traitor, but those other people, they just realize that blacks are better than whites" I mean... he was a stereotypical Jim Crow era negro that turned into some white-looking elve. He even got some surgery to remove the prognatism, talk about obsessions. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Because that's a copout. say, if someone is really fetishizing not out of a preference, but instead, to make a statement, to give a middle finger to society and rebel, to climb up a perceived social ladder, etc...yeah, that sort of person is contempt worthy. But someone who cant help what they find physically attractive, and naturally develop a trend based on that, then, can we really blame them or call them out? You are a slave to your cravings...we all are, and that goes for pedophiles too, it's just that some cravings are more of a menace/danger to society than others. A pedophile getting a hold of a defenseless child and satisfying his craving will do immeasurable damage physically and physiologically to that child. Someone satisfying his or her racial preference on the other hand isnt doing anyone harm, are they? |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
Because that's a copout. ![]() If you can't control your fetishes, then we're all slaves and we should leave people who defile animals (bad example, I'm not comparing any particular race to any animal species) alone because they're just doing what their body tells them to do. |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
It's not about doing any harm, because we're not talking about punishing them. A pedophile will be handled appropriately via the legal system.
We're talking about whether we should, as individual members of society, approve of such behavior. I happen to think that if someone is only sexually attracted to one group, whether it's their own, or another, that's racist... and being racist against your own people is even worse than being racist against other peoples. If Michael Jackson saw black women as unattractive, and had a fetish for white women, only finding Caucasians to be attractive, then he was a racist of the worst kind. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
And what if your race's women are ugly as fuck? The women aren't the ones with the problem. You are. (The rhetorical you, not you in particular. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
We're talking about whether we should, as individual members of society, approve of such behavior. I happen to think that if someone is only sexually attracted to one group, whether it's their own, or another, that's racist... and being racist against your own people is even worse than being racist against other peoples. If you want my honest opinion, I actually like to see mixed couples, whether they're with my group or not, male or female. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
I don't see why members of society should disapprove of anything unless it's harmful in some way, so in that sense it is about harm. You're free to dislike it if you wish, but I feel you're not telling the whole truth when you list your reasons why you dislike it. Intermarriage has produced some very, very attractive people. That being said, white girls with jungle fever, guys with yellow fetishes, etc. are what I'm railing against. There's nothing wrong in my opinion with finding another race attractive or wanting to get involved with someone, but, again, if you're exclusively interested in that group, then you're prejudiced against the others. I'm not sexually attracted to black women. That doesn't mean I dislike them, or that I don't befriend them. It's not cultural or racial. I just don't like their strong physical features. All other ethnic groups are fair game, though. Who cares about harm? When the ATM has "Press 1 for English, Press 2 for Spanish", it's not hurting anyone. It's actually helping some people. That doesn't stop a large portion of Americans from getting pissed off. That's human nature. |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
I think he's talking about exaggerated - almost fetishes - preferences towards certain ethnicities/races. Compare with the "racist dating"-thread which dealt with it too. I've got a Jewish friend. He speaks fluent Japanese and wants to move to Japan to teach English to kids. He is only attracted to women from the Orient. He's got pictures of Korean singers on his walls and watches Japanese porn and whatnot. I think that's absurd. Do I want him to be fined or thrown in jail? No, but he shouldn't be encouraged. Go to Japan, sure... have fun! ...the mentality behind it? That provokes only negative feelings from me. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Cardio ![]() Talk about bias. "MJ was a race traitor, but those other people, they just realize that blacks are better than whites" And what if your race's women are ugly as fuck? Incal and his anger towards Peruvian women ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
In your mind, do they exist? 2) "Race traitor" does not exist because "race" is not a defined entity to betray. Don't confuse the U.S. situation with the world. When we say black in America, we mean African AMerican, an ethnicity. White Americans, basically we mainly mean WASP or people who are acculterated into the WASP culture. The 'ethnic whites', who are "white" really are a minority and not the mainstream of white culture. 3) There is no biological or higher social imparitive to date or marry a person who is the most biologically similar to you. LOL That is all in your mind. There has never been any scientific study that showed that marrying certain groups of people are worse or better biologically...well, some groups might have high rates of genetic disease, but that says nothing about an individual. Basically everything you have said is your personal bias/tribalism. I don't give a damn who dates who. NOr do I second guess who dates who. I can't know what goes through other people's mind, and to be honest it is none of my damn business, if they aren't hurting me, forcing others to do something, it is their business. I thought you were libertarian? You should totalitarian. 4) If you really want to get down to it, I knew an Italian guy who loved the Irish chicks in high school, especially any redhead, he likely had no genes for redhair, I never saw him with an Italian chick. The only difference between him and a Eskimo who only dates Bushmen is degree of genetic distance, in reality it is the same shit... ---------- Post added 2010-08-02 at 09:23 ---------- Because they're insulting their heritage and spitting on their family. If my sister exclusively dated black guys, or Chinese guys, or whatever, I'd be just as upset if she converted to Islam or came out as a lesbian. Insulting their heritage. LOL That's all fantasy. If you grow up in the same country as someone, especially, as in the U.S., I'm originally from Ohio, for example, culturally, I'm a lot closer to the average "Czech" American there culturally than they are to a Czech in the Czech Republic. ![]() THere heritage was "spit on" the day they left their crap country for a better life, that's how I look at it. If your heritage was so fucking good, and your people all that, then why the fuck are you in the United States, when your family immigrated voluntarily? Obviously, at some point someone decided where we live sucks, they were not interested in fighting to make it better either. They weren't down with "dying for their people" and all that bullshit. So lets drop the ethnocentrism if you are American. If you then move to another country and try to retain some "pure ethnic line" as if you are going to continue your "civilization" in a foreign land surrounded by foreigner, I consider that personally asinine..hell 50% of Jews in America marry out, and they are probably the most ethno-centric people in the United States. Spitting in your family? LOL You act like your family is pure? You said that your last name is originally Arabic? So someone at some point "spit on their heritage" likely a few times in your family tree right? Maybe someone was raped? Well maybe the whore should have killed herself than have an invaders child, right? All this crap breaks down under the weight of the sticking shit it is built off on under basic scrutiny. All it is is tribal sentiment that you choose to buy into. Most of the ethnic groups that exist today did not exist 1500 years ago, and most of the ones that exist today won't exist 1500-2000 years from now, all that bullshit is transient, human history shows that quite well for most groups on earth. As I say all the time, an Englishman does not look in the mirror and cry that his ancestors spit on their heritage and he is a mutt of Roman (possibly even Africa, Middle Eastern, etc heritage, based on what we know of the troops housed there), various Celts, various Germanics, later Normans (who themselves were Gaulinized Roman, Frank, and Nordic Germanics)... No, he thinks "I'm an Englishman...fuck a Welsh and a Scot..." ![]() ---------- Post added 2010-08-02 at 09:24 ---------- ...the mentality behind it? That provokes only negative feelings from me. It's a personal problem. ---------- Post added 2010-08-02 at 09:55 ---------- I am a nationalist and do not like to see other Germans with people of other races. But I can not do anything since this is a private matter after all. |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
My personal feeling on the matter is that mixing is overall good for evolution and the more "pure" people are-the less attractive they seem to be--unless they are caucasians (to me, IMO).
I am seeking the best possible genes to mix with and even though, for most features, caucasoids are not clearly the best-they seem to me to be the best combination of genes without any glaring weaknesses that other races have (Asians-height and physique, SSA-skin color, hair texture and intlellect). However, if I come across and fall in love with a tall Asian chic with proper curves and exceptional athletic ability....I'd have no problem marrying her. Same goes for a Afram with light skin and 125+ IQ. Probably, these women are most likely to be already mixed-race (preferably with Euro admix) to have these combinations, but obviously not exclusively so. No matter the specifics, I would never marry a pure SSA or an average Asian (Physically), because I don't think the resulting phenotype would have much chance of improving my particular line. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|