LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-03-2011, 10:32 PM   #1
gymnAnemoe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default CBA Negotiations Extended
cnnbrk CNN Breaking News



#NFL Networks : NFL and the NFL Players union have agreed to a 24 hour extension in CBA negotiations http://on.cnn.com/e9rD9i

From Twitter
gymnAnemoe is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 10:35 PM   #2
LClan439

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
DonBanks Don Banks



Source said 24 hour extension is to keep working on longer extension of days or week.

From Twitter
LClan439 is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 10:42 PM   #3
xFZ3k8Mw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
Please get this shit done.
xFZ3k8Mw is offline


Old 05-04-2011, 03:23 AM   #4
XKAgustin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
If you click on the video of "How it will end", its pretty interesting.

http://www.profootballweekly.com/multimedia
XKAgustin is offline


Old 05-04-2011, 03:40 AM   #5
estuapped

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
If you click on the video of "How it will end", its pretty interesting.

http://www.profootballweekly.com/multimedia
Definitely interesting. But I bet it doesn't end up that way. There are a lot of egos involved and it's done by committee. It won't end up making nearly that much sense.
estuapped is offline


Old 05-04-2011, 03:49 AM   #6
EasyLOAD

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
567
Senior Member
Default
At least there is some idea that this thing needs to get done, and they know once this thing tips, it's going to be very very hard to right it.
EasyLOAD is offline


Old 09-03-2011, 07:23 AM   #7
Vegeinvalge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
So it's being reported on ESPN.com that the NFL is opening its books further. What? I thought they had already given the players full disclosure of the league's finances and whatnot. What else are these guys hiding? My trust of he owners and the league has really gone down hill now. That's not good at all. I wonder just how much leverage this gives to the players now?
Vegeinvalge is offline


Old 09-03-2011, 07:42 AM   #8
TineSeign

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
So it's being reported on ESPN.com that the NFL is opening its books further. What? I thought they had already given the players full disclosure of the league's finances and whatnot. What else are these guys hiding? My trust of he owners and the league has really gone down hill now. That's not good at all. I wonder just how much leverage this gives to the players now?
The owners never had the books opened completely and to my knowledge never stated that the players had each and every fact.

I'm just glad we're seeing more transparency and negotiation than we did back in the 80's.
TineSeign is offline


Old 10-03-2011, 01:51 PM   #9
bahrains27

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
379
Senior Member
Default
So last night about 100 locals got to hang out at the Players association HQ and mingle/listen to players and reps. I was not one of the lucky 100.
The gist of the whole evening as relayed on the radio this morning was:

there's no chance of an 18 game season
the owners have already flinched twice by signing the extension
D Smith is a totally different director than Gene was. This guy is a major hardass and wont let the owners get away with any crap
Decertification is most likely coming
bahrains27 is offline


Old 10-03-2011, 02:00 PM   #10
chuviskkk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
So last night about 100 locals got to hang out at the Players association HQ and mingle/listen to players and reps. I was not one of the lucky 100.
The gist of the whole evening as relayed on the radio this morning was:

there's no chance of an 18 game season
the owners have already flinched twice by signing the extension
D Smith is a totally different director than Gene was. This guy is a major hardass and wont let the owners get away with any crap
Decertification is most likely coming
Which I take as nothing is getting accomplished. Great.
chuviskkk is offline


Old 10-03-2011, 02:30 PM   #11
scewDeasp

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
So last night about 100 locals got to hang out at the Players association HQ and mingle/listen to players and reps. I was not one of the lucky 100.
The gist of the whole evening as relayed on the radio this morning was:

there's no chance of an 18 game season
the owners have already flinched twice by signing the extension
D Smith is a totally different director than Gene was. This guy is a major hardass and wont let the owners get away with any crap
Decertification is most likely coming
Good luck with that. With decertification, Smith is no longer in charge and Kessler steps to the front. And he's a dick. Also, two things could very well happen that the players won't like with decertification...

1) The league counter sues, showing the decertification to be the sham of a move that it really is.

2) The league cancels the draft, revenue sharing, and the salary cap. Rules of player movement are forgotten, and the 32 franchises act as 32 businesses- recruiting and competing for players, and paying them as much (and as little) as they would like. By doing this, they could prevent the non-union players from suing.
scewDeasp is offline


Old 12-03-2011, 06:12 PM   #12
tadacia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Good luck with that. With decertification, Smith is no longer in charge and Kessler steps to the front. And he's a dick. Also, two things could very well happen that the players won't like with decertification...

1) The league counter sues, showing the decertification to be the sham of a move that it really is.

2) The league cancels the draft, revenue sharing, and the salary cap. Rules of player movement are forgotten, and the 32 franchises act as 32 businesses- recruiting and competing for players, and paying them as much (and as little) as they would like. By doing this, they could prevent the non-union players from suing.
Sham of a move or not. Its on
tadacia is offline


Old 12-03-2011, 06:15 PM   #13
grizolsemn

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
Sham of a move or not. Its on
Upon further review, the last CBA contains language that the NFL cannot challenge the decertification as a sham.
“The Parties agree that, after the expiration of the express term of this Agreement, in the event that at that time or any time thereafter a majority of players indicate that they wish to end the collective bargaining status of the NFLPA on or after expiration of this Agreement, the NFL and its Clubs and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, representatives, agents, successors and assigns waive any rights they may have to assert any antitrust labor exemption defense based upon any claim that the termination by the NFLPA of its status as a collective bargaining representative is or would be a sham, pretext, ineffective, requires additional steps, or has not in fact occurred.

It's pretty clear. Which, for us fans, is good, as it makes it more likely that there will be football this season.
grizolsemn is offline


Old 12-03-2011, 06:35 PM   #14
ruforumczspam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Ugh...


http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ry/rumor-mill/

The fact that the NFL has locked out a supposedly non-union work force implies that the league believes the union has not properly and effectively decertified.

And the NFL has now expressly said so.

“The union only pretended to decertify in 1990,” NFL outside counsel Gregg Levy said in a statement provided to PFT. “As history has confirmed, that purported decertification was a sham. In an effort to protect its ability to repeat the fraud a second time, the union tried in the White settlement to limit the NFL’s ability to challenge in an antitrust court any future attempt by the union to pull off a similar sham. But that limitation could have applied only if the purported decertification occurred after expiration of the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. The union was in such a rush to get to court that it did not wait until SSA expiration. The league is therefore free to show that this ‘decertification’ is also a sham.”

Levy is referring to Article LVII, Section 3(b) of the CBA, which states as follows: “The Parties agree that, after the expiration of the express term of this Agreement, in the event that at that time or any time thereafter a majority
of players indicate that they wish to end the collective bargaining status of the NFLPA on or after expiration of this Agreement, the NFL and its Clubs and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, representatives,
agents, successors and assigns waive any rights they may have to assert any antitrust labor exemption defense based upon any claim that the termination by the NFLPA of its status as a collective bargaining representative is Article LVII, Mutual Reservation of Rights: Labor Exemption or would be a sham, pretext, ineffective, requires additional steps, or has not in fact occurred.” (Emphasis added.)

The problem for the players is that Article LVII, Section 3(a) of the CBA required them to wait six months before filing an antitrust lawsuit if they failed to file it before the expiration of the labor deal. So they’ve opted, apparently, to file the lawsuit in accordance with the terms of the CBA and hope that they can cobble together an argument that will allow the waiver of the “sham” defense to still apply.

The league’s position is pretty simple. By failing to wait until the CBA expired to decertify, the plain terms of the agreement preserves the league’s ability to argue that the process of shutting down the union is a sham.

And it is a sham. Everyone knows it’s a sham. But if the league can’t argue in court that it’s a sham, it doesn’t matter. If the league can argue that it’s a sham, then the league will be in good position to avoid an injunction and maintain a lockout.

Of course, that’s bad news for the fans, because it means that a lockout will continue until a deal is reached at the bargaining table. With the players taking personally the treatment they’ve experienced of late, the players may be willing to cut off theirs noses to spite their faces, which means that the offseason could indeed be compromised if not completely forfeited
ruforumczspam is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:16 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity