Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Lubitel 166b with the lens removed and a piece of tinfoil in its place. Used a safety pin to make the pinhole.
This is the guide I followed: http://www.creativegalleries.com/duc.../lubitel.shtml |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
These shots were quickly taken on a worktrip.
Click pics for larger ones. Canon 5D (with 24-70mm) ![]() ISO 100, 1/300s, f/8, 50mm ![]() ISO 100, 1/500s, f/4.5, 70mm ![]() ISO 100, ~1/1600s, f/2.8, 24mm I have "much" more but I don't have time to upload/post them. 2 hour drive to Sony's private showcase which starts @ 18.30 +2GMT (with... ummm... is it dinner?) |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
I never said it was the rules or anything. That just isn't a nature shot in my opinion. I always thought pictures of just one leaf was a nice nature pic when done right. But I may be wrong. Let me know ok? |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
ohhh, my apologies, what are the measurements/dimensions needed, to be shown in a photograph required, to enable a pic to fit into the nature category please? |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
If the leaf is on a flower on a balcony for example, I wouldn't call that nature. Nature is something, well natural. A place or location without human alteration. A flower in someone's back yard is not nature any more. The natural state of the flower has been changed. ![]() probably some are just photographing parts of nature that is available or accesible to them atm. say like if i was living in istanbul (where the closest tree is probably within 3-5km radius [rofl]) i would take a pic of a flower too. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|