[yarita]

I might have started a bit of a Canon / Nikon war [rofl]

I posted this shot over at DPReview, to highlight the 30D's capabilities at high ISO:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...hread=19372704

and then someone responds by linking my post over at a Nikon board in a thread there:

http://www.nikonians.org/cgi-bin/dcf...2&viewmode=all

[thumbup] [rofl]

[estuapped]

Hmm... I think you win; you're shot is much clearer.

[SkatrySkith]

Hmm... I think you win; you're shot is much clearer.

im with you on that.

[freediscountplanrrxip]

Wow, quite a whirlwind effect huh? You see what your cats DO to people??

JK bro. I am looking SO forward to getting a 30D!

[bppstorr]

Hmm... I think you win; you're shot is much clearer.

There's no comparing the shots. They're so completely different in subject matter, composition and apparent ambient lighting (and they've likely been scaled and cropped in different ratios/proportions) that results from one are meaningless for the other.

[pedFlicle]

Surely its the same sort of thing as comparing Nvidia/Ati screenies, you'd need to take the exact same picture, in the exact same place, with the exact same settings and the exact same light.


Hehe, fanboys aren't just confined to PC's.

[PetrZimin]

FFS chris, stop disguising this post as a "look what I've started elsewhere" thread!

We all know the turth, the truth to why you posted in here. You want us all to look at your PUSSY.

For crying out loud, NO NO NO!!!

[furillo]

There's no comparing the shots. They're so completely different in subject matter, composition and apparent ambient lighting (and they've likely been scaled and cropped in different ratios/proportions) that results from one are meaningless for the other.

Yep totally agree like comparing eggs with ehmm coal!!!
Cat shot wins it though

[allvideO]

There's no comparing the shots. They're so completely different in subject matter, composition and apparent ambient lighting (and they've likely been scaled and cropped in different ratios/proportions) that results from one are meaningless for the other.

You're probably right, and judging by the two shots themselves, I'm going to say Chris is probably the more skilled photographer. Either way from what I see here, the visible noise is less noticable (under the circumstances) in Chris' photo.