Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
Anyone any ideas what McLaren would be testing with this rear-wing apparatus - aero loads? Stresses? Flexing?:
And heres a nice photo of Ferrari's new innovative conical wheel nuts designed to help shave tenths of a pit-stops/tyre changes now there is no refuelling so tyre change speed gains extra importance - also as a side note - automated jacks are now banned as it was feared this could lead to a spending race by teams to develop the most innovative and fast jack equipment which is a shame for Williams for as far as I can recall in the recent past, they have always used motorised jacks in their stops! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
There's a good explanation of Ferrari's nuts here:
http://www.auto123.com/en/racing-new...s?artid=116263 They can automatically trigger the wheel gun and a light to signal when the operation is complete. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Clever. Anyone like to place a bet as to who'll make the first wheel-related cock up of the new season? If they're trying to change tyres in under three seconds I can imagine we might see at least one car leave without all four properly attached. I mean, they had 16 years of refuelling and still messed that up from time to time..
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Clever. Anyone like to place a bet as to who'll make the first wheel-related cock up of the new season? If they're trying to change tyres in under three seconds I can imagine we might see at least one car leave without all four properly attached. I mean, they had 16 years of refuelling and still messed that up from time to time.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
THEY ARE PRESSURE TAPS. Measuring air speed from the underside of the wing. I assumed as the teeth of the sensor was over the top and rear side of the wing, that was where was being measured. Very confusing stuff.. ![]() ![]() http://f1.f-e-n.net/images/f1/201002...jm1025fe48.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Of course it's confusing to you, it made the air go swish. Perhaps they are looking to see if there are any points at which the wing 'stalls'. Interesting to me is the fact they are measuring the left side. Is this to see if there is an effect from the small air intake on the left side of the nose not too far ahead of the cockpit? Incidentally, air does not go swish. It's its intraction with an obstruction and the friction (drag) thus caused which produces the sound. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Of course it's confusing to you, it made the air go swish. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Flow over the top surface of a wing is almost irrelevant. All the work is being done by the low pressure side. I've seen tunnel tests when something like a small tool or pen is left on the top surface by accident and it didn't show in the results didn't even move much. On the other hand I've seen flow separation on the underside caused by decals. You wouldn't believe me if I told you how fast the air exits off a high downforce wing t/e. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
I'm surprised nobody has brought up the new Ferrari shark-fin solution yet:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-conten...e__JLE0590.jpg |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|