![]() |
Anyone else get annoyed....
when drivers say the name of the title sponsor and team they work with?
For example, Lewis said the following: We started the season with what was the slowest car in the field, but we never gave up, and on Saturday in Abu Dhabi, you could argue that we had the fastest car out there. That's an absolutely incredible achievement – and I can't think of a single team other than Vodafone McLaren Mercedes that could have done that. Ach! Reminds me a lot of NASCAR when drivers spiel the entire roster of sponsors. I just hope drivers don't start saying, "Marlboro, Etihad, Bridgestone, FIAT, Ferrari, Alice, #7" before they say a word worth noticing. |
I think Vodafone would be even more annoyed if he didn't say it
|
probably in the contract there is somewhere that says the driver/team member has to mention the sponsors name when talking about his team.
still, its annoying. reminds me of the 70s and 80s with colin chapmans 'john player specials' rather than there true name........ |
Keeping your sponsors happy and in the limelight go hand in hand with continued sponsorship and good relations. It may be the team itself that does the actual work, but without the money to do so there is no team.
To me it's no different or less important than drivers that bring up how important the engineers and mechanics are to the team. |
If we want F1 to be the pinnacle then we have to accept that teams and drivers will whore themselves out for funding. It would be worse if the whole sport did it, like the Burger King F1 Championship.
|
Quote:
F1 is a business as is all professional motorsports. Lewis Hamilton races in F1 because of Vodafone, McLaren and Mercedes not in spite of them. |
Quote:
|
I think it's pretty obvious that whatever drivers say, it goes through a PR machine before getting published on the net or any newspaper. For example, any of Ferrari's press releases in the last year, or any of the track guides, make Kimi sound like a poet, when we all know he tells it as damn straight as possible.
What Lewis might have said must only be "Mclaren," and by the time it went through the PR machine, it became "Vodafone Mclaren Mercedes." Don't slack the driver for this, because IMO they don't even have the time to say all of that. http://www.motorsportforums.com/imag...ies/tongue.gif |
I don't like it.
I love NASCAR, but they seem to have misplaced the word 'car'. It really annoys me when someone says 'the number 24 DuPont Chevrolet Impala was great today'. It should be 'the CAR was great today'. Everyone has just watched you win the race for four hours, they know which car you drive and who the sponsors are, we don't need to be reminded. Also, 'I'd like to thank Pepsi, Dewalt, Shell, etc.' gets on my nerves. God help us if this makes it's way into Formula One as standard practice for the drivers. |
I dont think Hamilton especially said that - it is the name of the team, remember when tobacco advertising was prominent for example. I'd give him the benefit of teh doubt.
It is not unusual or extraordinary for a driver to day the full name. And even if he does, there is nothing wrong with it. It pays their bills and allows them lifestyles of extreme ease to say the least. Nobody objects to saying the "Bridgestone softs" or whatever, so why not the racing team? I agree that thanking each and every sponsor is over the top, very Budweiser versus Moet and something I would not like to see in f1, but that is not what Lewis did. On the other hand, f1 traditions are also broken when the drivers are required to substitute a fizzy liquid for champagne at grands prix due to barmy religion customs - but then religion is ridiculous anyway. |
Quote:
I hate it when a driver doesn't thank their sponsor. I consider it not only unprofessional but ungrateful as well. |
Quote:
The issue is the obvious commercial when nascar drivers bubble over and mention the laundry list of companies. Formula one is sophisticated and nascar-type behavior will be viewed as gauche. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A business arrangement relies on both parties being cheerleaders for each other. |
Yeah , bad old Lewis , actually uttering the actual name of the team , and in public , no less .
Ewww . Sends chills down the back of the neck , eh ? Get real , kids . Those who pays gobs for the naming rights like to hear the name . Should we also be upset with all those ugly ad signs we have to watch in telecasts of the race ? And , how horrible is it , that we are forced to put up with corporate colours on all those cars ? Shouldn't they all be white , with huge numbers to tell them apart ? This is the reality of the situation we have . The sponsors enable us to see cars racing . Don't slag a driver because he's appreciative . |
Quote:
|
http://www.motorsportforums.com/imag...s/laughing.gif
Quote:
f1 is just slow to catch up to the sophistication of naptaxicar.......of course that is why each of the top 20 drivers in nascar make far more money than each of the top 20 drivers in f1, and its money that is all important.....just look at what kimi wants i just love it when gordon shakes that tiny bottle of pepsi after a win.....soon f1 will be doing the samehttp://www.motorsportforums.com/imag...es/roflmao.gif opps, last f1 race....... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The difference from there to 'the number 24 DuPont Chevrolet Impala was great today' is quite large, though, and I hope F1 never gets there. If your team management can't negotiate a contract that doesn't forbid you to talk properly, you need better management. Sponsors pay for logos, association, drivers appearing at events etc. but they should never be allowed to control the words of individuals. |
Quote:
Gordon Sheddon/BTCC slipping in "Clydedale Bank" whenever he could was crafty and annoying at the same time. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2