LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-11-2013, 04:57 AM   #1
Quigoxito

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default Producers at fault for Honda Exit?
I've been demonstrably following a leave of Honda with depth, and reading 'expert' evaluation and also reading round the discussion boards, and appear to visit a large fault put on Bernie and Max for destroying anything and being reason behind placing F1 in a situation where Honda have drawn out. Personally, I can't understand why “its Bernie and Max’s fault” concept most people are offering. From my viewpoint, its 95% the producers problems. They joined F1 throughout a growth in the international economy, they could enter F1, and put that which was for them relatively small levels of money, and be most useful financed group on the grid. The price increased, as more and more producers joined. The producers have now been accountable for getting the expense up by this type of large amount. As manufacturers see F1 as a company prospect, nothing else, I recall Max and Bernie saying years back when manufacturers were flowing into F1 that it had been unsustainable for Formula 1 to exchange heavily to them. Max has been productive and upfront concerning the need certainly to spend less, but because it will give separate a far more equal playing field to rivals, demonstrably with producers having greatest finances, they've pulled their repairs in this way. In many ways, its extremely interesting that one of the first subjects of the recession is one of the primary causes to creating F1 financially unsustainable in the first place. I’m a realist, therefore I’m perhaps not likely to say Bernie and Max are better than bright, both, particularly Max, have all messed up. With the concept changes, meant to decrease costs have the truth is raised costs, and release of KERS an such like, its demonstrably perhaps not most useful time. But their type of thought has been appropriate. With Bernie, many try it out at him for hogging all of the money F1 makes. Well I’m scared he absolutely eligible for do this. CVC own 70% of Formula 1, Bernie just possesses ten percent, but is spokesman for CVC. Their shareholders and cvc paid vast amounts of pounds for F1, its Bernie work to ensure the shareholders obtain a good reunite on the investment. Why must CVC spend millions for F1, just for the earnings to get to another person? All of the groups currently in F1 joined Formula 1 once you understand the set up, today we’re striking a down economy, they would like to be bailed out by more earnings from F1. I simply don’t feel its right. At most useful, it'd just be considered a short term answer, it wouldn’t be considered a great motivation to lessen costs if they’re bailed out, I say keep them battle, they’ll have to reduce costs, and it'll be greater for F1 in the long term. I simply don't observe how people may place the blame mainly at Max and Bernie, certainly the blame must certanly be set towards the producers, who've purposely and knowingly brought the finances up to present levels, when compared with allows say Max, who has struggled for years and years to create the costs down, nevertheless, in situations has by error brought costs up somewhat. Therefore I was just wondering, how can people warrant it being mainly Max and Bernie problems for high prices of F1 that has resulted in leave of Honda? I'm perhaps not stating your all wrong, perhaps I've forgotten about certain pieces, I would like to comprehend most view.
Quigoxito is offline


Old 01-11-2013, 01:04 PM   #2
kiemzui

Join Date
Jan 2013
Age
36
Posts
4
Junior Member
Default
Chúng tôi vui m?ng du?c gi?i thi?u t?i các b?n h*ng d?ch v? kiem dinh he thong lanh. He thong lanh l* m?t trong nh?ng thi?t b? có yêu c?u nghiêm ng?t v? an to*n lao d?ng v* v? sinh lao d?ng.
Vì sao h? th?ng l?nh ph?i du?c ki?m d?nh, v* quy trình ki?m d?nh h? th?ng l?nh nhu th? n*o?An to*n lao d?ng trong v?n h*nh h? th?ng l?nh ra sao? kiemdinhvn.com s? trình b*y t?ng bu?c cùng xem xét d?
th?u hi?u hon công vi?c n*y hon.
Vì sao ph?i ki?m d?nh h? th?ng l?nh?
Th? nh?t h? th?ng l?nh l* m?t trong nh?ng thi?t b? có yêu c?u nghiêm ng?t v? an to*n lao d?ng v* v? sinh lao d?ng. Do dó h? th?ng l?nh b?t bu?c du?c ki?m d?nh
D?m b?o an to*n d?i v?i ngu?i lao d?ng, nh?m tránh các r?i ro ngo*i ý mu?n ra do tai n?n lao d?ng.
Dánh giá du?c m?c d? hu h?i. S? có bi?n pháp c?i thi?n quá trình ho?t d?ng d? nâng cao nang su?t l*m vi?c.
Hãy liên l?c ki?m d?nh h? th?ng l?nh : Mr.Phi - 0909.504.007
Tìm hi?u thêm v* d? ngh? ki?m d?nh h? th?ng l?nh t?i kiemdinhvn.com
kiemzui is offline


Old 01-11-2013, 02:52 PM   #3
hieptip11

Join Date
Jan 2013
Age
40
Posts
2
Junior Member
Default
D?ch v? kiem dinh k? thu?t an to*n ch?t lu?ng v?i các máy móc hi?n d?i nh?t hi?n t?i
Nh?ng lý do vu?t tr?i c?a Công ty chúng tôi m* b?n không th? b? qua, d? b?n quy?t d?nh ch?n công ty th?c hi?n ki?m d?nh k? thu?t an to*n máy móc v?t tu có yêu c?u nghiêm ng?t v? an to*n lao d?ng.
  • L?y khách h*ng l*m tr?ng tâm - Uy t*n l* m?c tiêu s?ng còn
  • Tu v?n online & tr?c ti?p m?t cách nhanh chóng v* t?n tình
L* don v? có ch?c nang ki?m d?nh an to*n các lo?i máy, thi?t b?, v?t tu có yêu c?u nghiêm ng?t v? an to*n lao d?ng. Chúng tôi luôn l?y tiêu ch* : an to*n - uy t*n - hi?u qu? l*m h*ng d?u. Công ty có d?i ngu k? thu?t viên d*y d?n kinh nghi?m v* trang thi?t b? máy móc hi?n d?i ho*n to*n có th? dáp ?ng các yêu c?u cao trong quá trình kiem dinh. Dáp ?ng vi?c ki?m d?nh th?c hi?n trong th?i gian nhanh nh?t k?t qu? khách quan.
Công ty luôn kiem dinh th?c t? theo dúng Quy trình ki?m d?nh c?a B? lao d?ng Thuong binh Xã h?i ban h*nh v* theo yêu c?u khác c?a don v?. Ngo*i nh?ng Quy trình ki?m d?nh s?n có do B? lao d?ng Thuong binh Xã h?i ban h*nh công ty có Biên so?n v* ban h*nh m?t s? quy trình ki?m d?nh t?m th?i d? ph?c v? công tác kiem dinh du?c t?t hon.
Công ty cam k?t tho? mãn t?t nh?t d? ngh? c?a khách h*ng, d?m b?o cung c?p d?ch v? kiem dinh, th* nghi?m v* các d?ch v? liên quan v?i ch?t lu?ng cao nh?t

Bên c?nh dó công ty còn cung c?p l?p h?c hu?n luy?n an to*n cho ngu?i lao d?ng l* m?t trong nh?ng cách quan tr?ng nh?t d? gi?m r?i ro, chi ph* v* d?m b?o an to*n cho doanh nghi?p. Nh?m ph? bi?n ki?n th?c an to*n trong s?n xu?t m?t cách ki lu?ng t?o m?t tru?ng l*m vi?c t? giác. Ngu?i s? d?ng lao d?ng ph?i t? ch?c hu?n luy?n an to*n cho ngu?i lao d?ng. Theo thông tu 37/LDTBXH-TT ng*y 19-9-1995 c?a B? Lao d?ng TBXH quy d?nh. Hu?n luy?n an to*n lao d?ng th?t s? c?n thi?t cho m?i cá nhân, doanh nghi?p.

D?y ngh? ng?n h?n c?p ch?ng ch? cho các công nhân dang v?n h*nh các thi?t b? có yêu c?u nghiêm ng?t v? an to*n lao d?ng nhu: N?i hoi, Palang, C?n tr?c, xe nâng.
CÔNG TY C? PH?N KI?M D?NH K? THU?T AN TOÀN THÀNH PH?
CITY TECHNICAL SAFETY INSPECTION JOINT STOCK COMPANY
TR? S? CHÍNH: 229/16/3 TÂY TH?NH, DU?NG TÂY TH?NH, Q.TÂN PHÚ, TP.HCM
VAN PHÒNG: 327 LÊ TR?NG T?N, P.SON K?, Q.TÂN PHÚ, TP.HCM
DT: (08)6 680 717 - HOTLINE: 0909504007 - FAX: (08)6 269 0253
Website: kiemdinhvn.com - Mail: kiemdinhtis@yahoo.com.vn
hieptip11 is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:54 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity