General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
If you answered The Sears Tower you're wrong: http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.as...entid=15025271
As someone with, shall we say, close ties to this news what does everyone here think of this move? As a brit I always held Sears Tower in a group of famous US landmarks such as Empire State, Golden Gate Bridge etc and can't imagine how well this would go down your side of the pond. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Well the Sears tower wont be the tallest in the US for much longer. It will be replaced by another building in Chicago. The Chicago Spire. http://www.thechicagospire.com/ should be over 600m tall. So it's at least 150m taller than Sears.
It's under construction already at the stage of still being a hole in the ground. Actually I just thought I'd google to see how it's progressing and construction is halted! http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune....icago-spi.html LOL @ the suggestions as to what Chicago could do with a big hole if the thing never gets built. I hope it does as it would be a magnificent addition to the skyline. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Well the Sears tower wont be the tallest in the US for much longer. It will be replaced by another building in Chicago. The Chicago Spire. http://www.thechicagospire.com/ should be over 600m tall. So it's at least 150m taller than Sears. The name represents the building and it was born together with it. Just like you! |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
The thing is a building from the 70's is only renamed because they can't find people willing to rent it office space otherwise!... lol. Better than making it an empty building where they might think about tearing it down. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|