LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-05-2009, 07:25 PM   #1
ENGINESSQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default Unique Solution to Sterilize the "under class"
It'd disproportionately impact certain racial groups more than others, ergo everyone's gonna call it racist, ergo it's never gonna happen. Ok, thread over, nothing to see here folks.
ENGINESSQ is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 07:32 PM   #2
Shemker394

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
I would think it's a great idea if we could replace the "under class" with "people like Floyd".

I mean, personally I'd go further and make sterilization a condition of welfare/food stamps, so this proposal doesn't seem that extreme at all. Wow.

We definitely, definitely need to sterilize you.
Shemker394 is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 07:34 PM   #3
ecosportpol_ru

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
323
Senior Member
Default
I'd rather stop the stupid people from breeding rather than the poor.
ecosportpol_ru is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 07:36 PM   #4
DoctoNilsonDen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default
Anyone who had seen the movie Idiocracy knows that poor people (who are mostly stupid) get more tail than smart people, weakening our national security and delaying scientific research efforts while only rewarding us with the occasional Lebron James. The only way to counteract this is to sterilize stupid people, and temporarily make it a crime to have kids if making, say, less than $85,000.
DoctoNilsonDen is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 07:57 PM   #5
Xtatotvk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
387
Senior Member
Default
We should allow some to breed; for comedic prosperity.
Xtatotvk is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 08:11 PM   #6
refdhbgtd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
I would think it's a great idea if we could replace the "under class" with "people like Floyd".
Another FACT brought to you by Asher.
refdhbgtd is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 08:44 PM   #7
DghtRdc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
No, we're supposed to berate David Floyd for posting this thread, and then he will be so ashamed of his misconduct that he will turn over a new leaf.
DghtRdc is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 08:51 PM   #8
Inonanialry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
Frankly, I'd be more concerned with sterilizing the entire southern US -- including Texas -- than inmates.

We should also sterilize gun owners and Christians.

And also NFL fans.
Inonanialry is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 10:26 PM   #9
Munccoughe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
That seems like an idiot troll to me.

Christians I can understand, except that if we are trying to prevent crime, sterilizing blacks would be much more effective based on statistics.
I'm pretty sure sterilizing (or culling) anyone who owns a gun would reduce all kinds of crime. Ditto for Texans.
Munccoughe is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 10:31 PM   #10
Bonioners

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default
Someone would say God sterilized the evil ones by making them gay...

(feed the troll!)
Bonioners is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 10:33 PM   #11
ViagraFeller

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
585
Senior Member
Default
Frankly, I'd be more concerned with sterilizing the entire southern US -- including Texas -- than inmates.

We should also sterilize gun owners and Christians.

And also NFL fans.
Let's not forget the "pro" wrestling fans.
ViagraFeller is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 10:57 PM   #12
accelieda

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default
Excellent.

Next up - NASCAR fans.
accelieda is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 11:14 PM   #13
mirzaterak

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
Floyd lives in Austin so he's not a real Texan.

Seriously? I can't believe I'm having to agree with Asher over you. Sterilization is hardly a 'libertarian' approach. Paying people to not have kids is just as stupid as paying farmers not to farm.
mirzaterak is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 11:20 PM   #14
LillyPlay

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
I would think it's a great idea if we could replace the "under class" with "people like Floyd".
LillyPlay is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 11:29 PM   #15
pheelixoss

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
La'Twan McCrackbaby? Come on man, everyone knows the Irish are drunks and not crankheads.
pheelixoss is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 11:42 PM   #16
ibiDb4uu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
I don't think your solution is "unique". I'm sure I've heard it before.
ibiDb4uu is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 11:44 PM   #17
forumsfavoriteall

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
346
Senior Member
Default
Dude, we don't like to think about old people doin' it... thanks for the visual
forumsfavoriteall is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 11:46 PM   #18
unapelosina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
The above was to Rah, BTW.
unapelosina is offline


Old 11-05-2009, 11:48 PM   #19
DevaRextusidis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
final solution
Here's hoping that was deliberate...
DevaRextusidis is offline


Old 11-06-2009, 12:00 AM   #20
chinesemedicine

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
You're an idiot. Why would you want La'Twan McCrackbaby running around, when you could simply have paid his mother $10,000 not to have him? The solution is not to pay welfare at all. I know, it's brilliant innit.

Paying people not to have kids is like the antithesis of 'libertarian'.

Note that the 10k you spent on his mother would result in long-term savings, as the potential La'Twan McCrackbaby will more than likely suck down WAY more than 10k in terms of either social services or prison fees. You're assuming:

1. The majority of those who would take advantage of the program would be black.
2. That the economy has no connection with the birthrates. You need to have people to sell to if you want to make money.
3. That the government should be in the business of paying people to be sterilized.
4. That La'Twan will be a 'criminal, useless eater or partake of public services.

The solution to welfare problems is to stop giving people money for welfare without:

a) some form of drug checkup. Why do we force people who want to get a job to be tested for drugs, when we don't test those on welfare? It should be the opposite.

b) some form of accountability. Say you can go on it for a year, and then you have to go off it.

c) do away with it altogether. We shouldn't be paying people to do nothing.
chinesemedicine is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity