LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-04-2009, 01:57 PM   #1
Rithlilky

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default Arnold Vants Der High-Speed Rail
If Californians want high-speed rail, that's fine. The citizens of California should have to pay for it themselves, however. There's no reason taxpayers in other states should have to help pay for a high-speed rail line that won't benefit them.
Rithlilky is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 02:01 PM   #2
SinncmxM

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
If Californians want high-speed rail, that's fine. The citizens of California should have to pay for it themselves, however. There's no reason taxpayers in other states should have to help pay for a high-speed rail line that won't benefit them.
There is as much reason as us having to pay for freeways in other states which we don't use every day. Yet pay them we do. In fact, you sponges in fly over country constantly take our money so it's time to give some back to daddy.
SinncmxM is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 02:12 PM   #3
Broker15015

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
Because it will no doubt be expanded shortly after it is done. I imagine Las Vegas, Reno, and Phoenix will all be options. Other possible future link ups to the Northwest via Portland and Seattle could also be worked out. Of course, first you have to have something to link too and that's where the current project comes in. Las Vegas to LA route is probably the surest thing as it would be very high volume.
Broker15015 is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 02:32 PM   #4
kimaddison

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
So you're saying that the federal government shouldn't build a fort, a bridge, a road, a levee, a canal, a national park, a shipyard or anything unless it would benefit all of the states??
kimaddison is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 02:40 PM   #5
estelle

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
You blood suckers are constantly taking money from us for things which are entirely local so I really don't care if the never do wells whine. This is a great project which will employ over 100,000 people so it is exactly what the Stimulus funds are supposed to be for.
estelle is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 02:54 PM   #6
Gazeboss

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Gazeboss is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 05:20 PM   #7
womberte

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Plus, Californians are douches.

ACK!
womberte is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 10:23 PM   #8
nd90t3sf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
451
Senior Member
Default
Plus, Californians are douches.

ACK!
You're just mad because everyone hates Texas.
nd90t3sf is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 10:34 PM   #9
Jadldqys

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
You're just mad because everyone hates Texas.
Not really, I have lived in both places, even your precious San Diego, so I know the difference.

ACK!
Jadldqys is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 10:38 PM   #10
CialisBestPrice

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
576
Senior Member
Default
Not really, I have lived in both places, even your precious San Diego, so I know the difference.

ACK!
Shitty weather vs good weather? Raving gun nuts vs normal people?
CialisBestPrice is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 10:55 PM   #11
9uWzBx4l

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
But with white people, and money, and nice houses.
9uWzBx4l is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 11:07 PM   #12
exiceJetLip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
But with white people, and money, and nice houses.
Racist.

San Diego is better because it had white people.

The truth has come out.

ACK!
exiceJetLip is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 11:10 PM   #13
usacomm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
554
Senior Member
Default
On a normal day here I can see forever, SD you can see 4 feet.

I remember actually being able to see the coast of Mexico clearly once in 3.5 years. Usually blocked by a nasty brown haze.

The state with the gun nuts also has the far nicer and more polite people.......

ACK!
Actually our air quality is one of the best of any large city in America. There is a lot of coastal haze though but that is natural and blows in off the ocean.
usacomm is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 11:18 PM   #14
JulieSmithXIV

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
529
Senior Member
Default
Mexico has plenty of money - more billionaires per capita than the US (IIRC) .
JulieSmithXIV is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 11:21 PM   #15
pharmacologist30

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
339
Senior Member
Default
You are a complete tard if you think that's the 25 largest cities in America... especially since places like Modesto, CA, Lancaster, PA, and Medford, OR, are listed.
pharmacologist30 is offline


Old 10-04-2009, 11:30 PM   #16
QqJamxqP

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
Did you just call Oerdin a 21st century shanty Irishman?
QqJamxqP is offline


Old 10-05-2009, 03:04 AM   #17
radicalvolume

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
If Californians want high-speed rail, that's fine. The citizens of California should have to pay for it themselves, however. There's no reason taxpayers in other states should have to help pay for a high-speed rail line that won't benefit them.
That's my first thought. How the hell will they pay for it? Arnie is an idiot.
The only things worse are the people that keep handing him the shovel to dig a deeper hole.
radicalvolume is offline


Old 10-05-2009, 05:03 AM   #18
newwebstar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
Oerdin is an illiterate San Diegian. He is also poor and Irish.
That's spot on except I'm not poor, I'm not Irish, nor am I illiterate. Besides, when we met up didn't I have to buy you beer and food because you were unemployed?
newwebstar is offline


Old 10-05-2009, 06:39 AM   #19
flielagit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
289
Senior Member
Default
That's spot on except I'm not poor, I'm not Irish, nor am I illiterate. Besides, when we met up didn't I have to buy you beer and food because you were unemployed?
I am a gentle manne of leisure.

flielagit is offline


Old 10-05-2009, 06:40 AM   #20
Stacypettlerr

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
456
Senior Member
Default
It's an opinion piece but it's from today's LA Times.

Last November, voters passed a bond measure(2008) approving $9.95 billion to fund a high-speed train line from San Diego to Sacramento. They couldn't have known it then, but the timing was fortuitous. Months later, as part of the stimulus package, Congress dedicated $8 billion to pay for high-speed rail projects across the country. California is the only state where voters have already approved funding for a bullet train, and it has the most state-of-the-art proposal, with the most planning work completed, in the nation. Because the funding is meant to stimulate the economy as quickly as possible, officials at the Federal Railroad Administration are expected to give priority to applicants that can start hammering rail spikes soon. So when the California High-Speed Rail Authority submitted its application on Friday, it had powerful arguments on its side. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...,3316018.story

At least three sections are indeed shovel ready with engineering and environment permits granted and even bids submitted from contractors. The Stimulus bill included $8 billion just for high speed rail and California is the only state where its ready to go.
Stacypettlerr is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity