General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
No. The constitution does not grant the right to vote. Show me where it does. Art. 1, Sec. 2 Art. 4, Sec. 4 The constitution states that you cannot restrict people from voting according to certain criteria (race, religion, etc...), but it doesn't guarantee the right to vote. Reread 15. The right to vote is explicitly mentioned, and it's impossible to restrict what does not exist. The right is a necessary prerequisite to the proscription against its being restricted, unless you want to argue that the amendment process was put to use just to insert a speculative or nonsensical statement into the nation's founding document. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
the general public is brainwashed incredibly easily by the simplest of things handed down from the rulers at top. In our lifetime we have dramatic TV shows, isolated capitalisms instead of communal harmonies, and crazy religions. The public isn't stupid, they're misguided. You do know what happened with those 60's communes don't you? |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
That is right ladies and gentlemen. The populous is too stupid to know what it wants. Sheeple, follow the leader and do as Uncle Simon says. Can we restrict voting rights now? No. Voting rights arise, not from I.Q points, but from the God-given right of humans to control their own destinies. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|