Blind Search Engine Comparison tool...Google was dead last for me - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**OvDojQXN** · 06-10-2009, 04:16 PM

I'm splitting between bing and google. Yahoo is terrible.

**Seesspoxy** · 06-10-2009, 04:26 PM

ha ha

**stuntduood** · 06-10-2009, 04:41 PM

The picture today is pretty. The problem is the site design. They need a more organic way to incorporate the picture. Honestly, it looks like something I would have designed.

**Maydayvar** · 06-10-2009, 04:50 PM

The blue and orange "b" looks ugly too.

The part which is actually contained in the picture is fine (i.e. search field + explore menu).

It's the way the things AROUND the picture look relative to it which is bad.

**poekfpojoibien** · 06-10-2009, 04:51 PM

Results page is nice. Search page needs work.

**snova** · 06-10-2009, 04:52 PM

BTW, the bing.com fare predictor and fare history feature for flights is pretty awesome. Don't know of something like this elsewhere: http://www.bing.com/travel/

I thought that there was another fare predictor out there. I've definitely heard of something like that.

**M1zdL0hh** · 06-10-2009, 04:54 PM

The blue and orange "b" looks ugly too.

The part which is actually contained in the picture is fine (i.e. search field + explore menu).

It's the way the things AROUND the picture look relative to it which is bad.

The grey?

**flnastyax** · 06-10-2009, 04:57 PM

I find it hard to express precisely my problems with it because I'm terrible at visual arts. But I can tell that there is something awkward with it.

**yQvpyNt3** · 06-10-2009, 05:03 PM

Bing is incredibly ugly. Its travel predictor is only 70% accurate. If I WANTED TO GAMBLE ON MY FLIGHTS I'd fly Air France. And Google is still better.

Asher, post your search terms so we can verify you aren't as full of **** as you are.

C# lambda
XAML animations

**RalfDweflywex** · 06-10-2009, 05:06 PM

Google 6
Yahoo 3
Bing 1

**MediconStop** · 06-10-2009, 05:23 PM

One is better than the other. Not the same.

Bing put the '04 Stanley Cup run first, no other did...for example.

**PemiaGefe** · 06-10-2009, 05:53 PM

The first link was to wikipedia, you retarded retard.

**logpogingg** · 06-10-2009, 05:55 PM

Wikipedia's search sucks. Here's the same query on wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...nley+cup&go=Go

It's ****ing useless.

**mpxricyNimb** · 06-10-2009, 05:57 PM

YES WE ARE YOU RETARDEDLY RETARDED RETARD.

NON SQUEEZITER MY ASS.

**oxinsnepe** · 06-10-2009, 05:59 PM

HOW DARE YAR TALK TO ME LIKE THAT. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HTE MERITS OF A SEARCH ENGINE :NOT: THE MERITS OF THE SEARCH FUNCTIONS OF THE WEB SITES THAT THOSE SEARCH ENGINES FIND! What you are trying to do IS THE EQUIVALENT OF KILLING THE MESSENGER BECAUSE HE BRINGS YOU A PIECE OF PAPER WITH NEWS ON IT THAT DOES NOT COOK YOUR BREAKFAST. It's IRRELEVANT. It is a NON SQUEITAR.

**Hitfaromarf** · 06-10-2009, 06:02 PM

And stop arguing with yourself, Asher. It's undignified.

**cbUDaNFRu** · 06-10-2009, 06:04 PM

NEW SEARCH COMPARISON: AUTOEROTIC ASPHYXIATION IN THAILAND

**RarensussyRen** · 06-10-2009, 06:06 PM

I worry that's he's not.

**Dwnijzhd** · 06-10-2009, 06:08 PM

**enrisaabsotte** · 06-10-2009, 06:12 PM

I took LATIN FOR SEVEN YEARS. The endings are R RIS TAR MUR MINI NTUR for the active. Third person singulatr nueter -- IT DOES NOT FOLLOW - IS -TAR therefore NON SEQUITAR. Leave it to me to correct you again you BASTARD STAY OUT OF THIS.

Asher I am sorry Bing doesn't display hot shy gay men flexing their man boobs and having sex with puppy faces.

AND GUESS WHAT GIRLFRIEND? AUTO AROTIC ASPHYIXATION IN THAILAND RETURNS A GENERAL DEFINITION AND THEN A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE IN GOOGLE -- IN BING IT WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE DAVID CARRADINE [B]IS[/B[ THE MOST IMPORTANT RESULT?!

IT SEEMS CLEAR -- BING PRIORITIZES RECENT EVENTS; GOOGLE DOES NOT; MAYBE BECAUSE GOOGLE HSA BEEN AROUND LONGER YOU IDIIOT:MAD:

06-10-2009, 04:16 PM	#1
OvDojQXN Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 457 Senior Member	Blind Search Engine Comparison tool...Google was dead last for me I'm splitting between bing and google. Yahoo is terrible. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 04:26 PM	#2
Seesspoxy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 528 Senior Member	ha ha Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 04:41 PM	#3
stuntduood Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 435 Senior Member	The picture today is pretty. The problem is the site design. They need a more organic way to incorporate the picture. Honestly, it looks like something I would have designed. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 04:50 PM	#4
Maydayvar Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 511 Senior Member	The blue and orange "b" looks ugly too. The part which is actually contained in the picture is fine (i.e. search field + explore menu). It's the way the things AROUND the picture look relative to it which is bad. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 04:51 PM	#5
poekfpojoibien Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 501 Senior Member	Results page is nice. Search page needs work. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 04:52 PM	#6
snova Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 432 Senior Member	BTW, the bing.com fare predictor and fare history feature for flights is pretty awesome. Don't know of something like this elsewhere: http://www.bing.com/travel/ I thought that there was another fare predictor out there. I've definitely heard of something like that. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 04:54 PM	#7
M1zdL0hh Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 374 Senior Member	The blue and orange "b" looks ugly too. The part which is actually contained in the picture is fine (i.e. search field + explore menu). It's the way the things AROUND the picture look relative to it which is bad. The grey? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 04:57 PM	#8
flnastyax Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 454 Senior Member	I find it hard to express precisely my problems with it because I'm terrible at visual arts. But I can tell that there is something awkward with it. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 05:03 PM	#9
yQvpyNt3 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 425 Senior Member	Bing is incredibly ugly. Its travel predictor is only 70% accurate. If I WANTED TO GAMBLE ON MY FLIGHTS I'd fly Air France. And Google is still better. Asher, post your search terms so we can verify you aren't as full of **** as you are. C# lambda XAML animations Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 05:06 PM	#10
RalfDweflywex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 578 Senior Member	Google 6 Yahoo 3 Bing 1 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 05:23 PM	#11
MediconStop Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 353 Senior Member	One is better than the other. Not the same. Bing put the '04 Stanley Cup run first, no other did...for example. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 05:53 PM	#12
PemiaGefe Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 527 Senior Member	The first link was to wikipedia, you retarded retard. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 05:55 PM	#13
logpogingg Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	Wikipedia's search sucks. Here's the same query on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...nley+cup&go=Go It's ****ing useless. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 05:57 PM	#14
mpxricyNimb Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 440 Senior Member	YES WE ARE YOU RETARDEDLY RETARDED RETARD. NON SQUEEZITER MY ASS. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 05:59 PM	#15
oxinsnepe Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 489 Senior Member	HOW DARE YAR TALK TO ME LIKE THAT. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HTE MERITS OF A SEARCH ENGINE :NOT: THE MERITS OF THE SEARCH FUNCTIONS OF THE WEB SITES THAT THOSE SEARCH ENGINES FIND! What you are trying to do IS THE EQUIVALENT OF KILLING THE MESSENGER BECAUSE HE BRINGS YOU A PIECE OF PAPER WITH NEWS ON IT THAT DOES NOT COOK YOUR BREAKFAST. It's IRRELEVANT. It is a NON SQUEITAR. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 12 (0 members and 12 guests)

06-10-2009, 06:02 PM	#16
Hitfaromarf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 426 Senior Member	And stop arguing with yourself, Asher. It's undignified. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 06:04 PM	#17
cbUDaNFRu Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 451 Senior Member	NEW SEARCH COMPARISON: AUTOEROTIC ASPHYXIATION IN THAILAND Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 06:06 PM	#18
RarensussyRen Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 465 Senior Member	I worry that's he's not. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 06:08 PM	#19
Dwnijzhd Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 427 Senior Member	Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-10-2009, 06:12 PM	#20
enrisaabsotte Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 441 Senior Member	I took LATIN FOR SEVEN YEARS. The endings are R RIS TAR MUR MINI NTUR for the active. Third person singulatr nueter -- IT DOES NOT FOLLOW - IS -TAR therefore NON SEQUITAR. Leave it to me to correct you again you BASTARD STAY OUT OF THIS. Asher I am sorry Bing doesn't display hot shy gay men flexing their man boobs and having sex with puppy faces. AND GUESS WHAT GIRLFRIEND? AUTO AROTIC ASPHYIXATION IN THAILAND RETURNS A GENERAL DEFINITION AND THEN A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE IN GOOGLE -- IN BING IT WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE DAVID CARRADINE [B]IS[/B[ THE MOST IMPORTANT RESULT?! IT SEEMS CLEAR -- BING PRIORITIZES RECENT EVENTS; GOOGLE DOES NOT; MAYBE BECAUSE GOOGLE HSA BEEN AROUND LONGER YOU IDIIOT:MAD: Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote