General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
The site's problem was chronic technical issues, hideous home page and news page designs, lack of news content, excessive forum fragmentation, and lack of vision.
The OTF is actually one of the only active parts of the site. A lot of people blame the DL dance (which AFAIK only is done in the OTF) and abrasive posters in the OTF for the decline, but that's demonstrably not true. The behaviour of posters in the OTF doesn't impact the fact that the Civ4 forums are dead. People who want to Civ go to CivFanatics -- simple as that... |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Ok, Im a manager over 46 people and 3 facilties at work. There's a reason why this site isn't growing, and it has nothing to do with lack of exposure. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
... lack of news content... For the record on it, Apolyton was at least in my mind the undisputed Civ news leader for the ~5 1/2 years when I comprehensively covered such stories on-site almost solely on my own. Unfortunately I burned out on it and despite the efforts of many, that department has yet to recover. (There was also a period when Markos and I were able to share that task, adding to the total time Poly had ongoing, well above average Civ-based news coverage.) |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
IMO, it is as simple as doing the work. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
As I said in the thread of mine that just got deleted...
Poly does have going for it PolyCast. While the OT posters mostly like just the OT, quite a few people listen in that don't post here. I'm an exception. PolyCast is fun, more people should go on the show and listen in. I said this to Asher, which would have been good. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
As I said in the thread of mine that just got deleted... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Ive said it dozens of times ill say it again we need to bring back a section for a ladder tournament/arena for Civ 2, 4, or whatever. Diplogames are long and boring.
Im talking about 1 on 1 dual maps, leaderboards, heated competition. An unprecedented PvP Civ section 24/7 like MSN Gaming Zone had in late 90's/early 2000. Simpler format perhaps, but that sort of idea. Im telling you straight to your face, Dan, it will work. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
AAHZ, is thera reason it cannot be started? But I cant code an entire page with automated leaderboards, player stats (possible incorperated into profiles) the network capabilities to link the games together, etc. But LOGICALLY if done this site would eclipse CFC possible within a few months. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
I havent been to CFC for many years and I just posted some unit animations I'd done, I never discussed anything about CIV there. The site seemed too young for me. Maybe its changed, I dunno (but I doubt it)
Personally, I dont want the kiddies here (we have enough here already - see numerous Asher masturbation threads) so my answer is PORN. Turn poly into an adult CIV site. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|