LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-26-2009, 08:47 PM   #21
barsikjal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
And only slightly smaller deficits for years to come.

Commence indigestion. We're going to be paying this off for generations.
You have way more faith in the American political system than I.
barsikjal is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 08:49 PM   #22
Nglvayhp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
What proof/reasoning do you offer that all this spending will prevent a depression, or that one will happen if we don't spend?

So far, all I've heard is Obama's fear mongering about things getting worse.
Similar to what the REPUG are always accused of when talking about the war on terror.
I don't have proof myself. But what proof do you have that "doing nothing" or "tax cuts without additional spending" is the best route?
Nglvayhp is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 09:00 PM   #23
SawbasyWrab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
I don't have proof myself. But what proof do you have that "doing nothing" or "tax cuts without additional spending" is the best route?
The fact that you're willing to spend trillions of dollars without proof scares the hell out of a lot of people.
SawbasyWrab is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 09:05 PM   #24
beethyday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
497
Senior Member
Default
Indeed. Let's keep some perspective. I mean as bad as things have been, we haven't even reached 10% unemployment.
True. Using the methods to measure unemployment like in the 30's, we've surpassed 10%.
beethyday is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 09:24 PM   #25
ASSESTYTEAH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default
The real question for me is whether I want to stick around and try to fix the country or just bolt to sweet, low-tax Ireland...


We'd need an 18% hike in total revenues (including state and local) to hit Ireland's tax/GDP ratio. Federal revenues would have to go up by 36%.
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/27/41498733.pdf
ASSESTYTEAH is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 09:28 PM   #26
Bymnbypeten

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
348
Senior Member
Default
Yes. It reminds me of the '40s & '50's when Democratic spending built the strongest middle-class the world had even seen.
And comparing now to the 40s and 50s is even more delusional.
Bymnbypeten is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 09:29 PM   #27
marketheal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
This is not 1929. Projections from economists are varied and plentiful as candy with as much substance.
And you think 1929 was different?
marketheal is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 09:33 PM   #28
bQXHsKzS

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
And who is that somebody. Its that little voice in the back of their heads saying we can get away with this.

And While I won't argue your point, which party had control of congress in December? Which branch of the government has primary control of expenditures?
bQXHsKzS is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 09:35 PM   #29
proslaviy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
349
Senior Member
Default
Keynes' General Theory didn't come out till '36.
That is correct there was no stimulus in 1929 or the early 30's
proslaviy is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 09:45 PM   #30
VIAGRAENLINOBARATOCAMPRAR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Indeed. Let's keep some perspective. I mean as bad as things have been, we haven't even reached 10% unemployment.
I would not be totally shocked if at some point, we do reach ten percent unemployment. IIRC we're already at 7 percent.
VIAGRAENLINOBARATOCAMPRAR is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 10:00 PM   #31
newshep

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
I would not be totally shocked if at some point, we do reach ten percent unemployment. IIRC we're already at 7 percent.
Then you can start getting 40% worried about us going into a Depression that needs a New Deal.
newshep is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 10:17 PM   #32
MightyMasd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
Well, you know, the whole, every other Western country's economy was destroyed and needed imports from the US could have helped with that post-war boom too. Just sayin'
MightyMasd is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 10:22 PM   #33
outsitWrord

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, the only country who's factories hadn't been bombed out.
outsitWrord is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 10:25 PM   #34
AlabamaBoyz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
622
Senior Member
Default
Ireland's score on the Tax Misery Index is almost as low as the United States' and is the lowest of the countries I might consider moving to. Seems like the best alternative to escape a rising American tax burden.

http://www.forbes.com/global/2005/0523/024chart.html

As long as it's clear that you're using some bullshit metric instead of a simple revenue/GDP figure, whatever dude.
AlabamaBoyz is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 10:49 PM   #35
GZFL2tDA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
351
Senior Member
Default
Yes. The US actually isn't in Europe. BTW, that figure is six years old.
GZFL2tDA is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 10:59 PM   #36
gSjQEEmq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
451
Senior Member
Default
Right wingers such as yourself are frequently ignorant about how the Irish tax burden compares to our own. Just correcting you. It's a public service.
gSjQEEmq is offline


Old 02-26-2009, 11:15 PM   #37
intendepods

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
Implicit in that ridiculous statement is the belief that federal taxes are going to increase by significantly more than a third.
intendepods is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity