LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-16-2009, 05:27 AM   #1
Deseassaugs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default Moore's Law/Discovery CHannel/Beer
Larger IC = more distance between transistors = slower, IIRC. I think at a certain point (around 2-3cm on a side apparently) it becomes more efficient to have a second processor than to have a single processor be larger.

Unless you're massively oversimplifying, though, they aren't entirely explaining Moore's Law properly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moores_Law

Moore's Law is quite simply a statement by a guy that ICs would increase in power exponentially in a periodic fashion. In fact, he massively UNDERestimated it (originally saying every 10 years, only later altering that to every 2 years). Recently (probably what was talked about on your DC show) he said that it had to end eventually - we could not keep getting smaller indefinitely, we'd hit the atomic level. Of course, I'd suggest that quantum computing would just start at that point
Deseassaugs is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity