General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
They've measured facials and voice, meaning that they've sort of measured those to determine if the person is saying what he believes is true.
So it's not spinning issues, but if you believe what you are saying is true. I actually have investigated this method of lie detecting using voice analyzers, and it has a pretty good odds, but it doesn't function like this at all. So no, you can't actually measure it too much using public speeches, as in you still need a person conducting it, asking questions, control questions, everything, just like in normal lie detection situation. Otherwise it doesn't work well, or at all. But otherwise it is an interesting technology, we were looking that to see if we could hunt down hackers calling in via phone and asking for information, meaning that they lie who they are and if we could detect that easily, automatically, it would be of great advantage. Turns out it doesn't work, unless the person on the other end of the line is as good as an actual lie detection specialist. So no. Not yet at least. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles
Well, no, it seemed like it was measuring whether they believed what they were saying or not, too? So, clearly, Republicans are shoot-from-the-hip people who truly believe what they say, whereas Democrats are nothing more than big-talking artificers. "Artificers??" Wow, that was very . . . cosmopolitan. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|