General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
making sense of US foreign policy???
well it must be deadly boring in Croatia this winter ![]() there is nothing mysterious about it... it is there to make money for those who put presidents into the oval office... pretty straight deal i'd think for those who have $$$ to invest into politicians. Best return on investment I heard (not only there either) ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Originally posted by DirtyMartini
I don't know much, but is seems to me Neoconservatism as it is used today, bears little relation to the original Neoconservative movement/philosophy. Well duh. It's become a pejorative meaning whatever the person using it doesn't like rather than a foreign policy school of thought. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Originally posted by DinoDoc
Well duh. It's become a pejorative meaning whatever the person using it doesn't like rather than a foreign policy school of thought. Well double duh. ![]() Even when not used pejoratively it doesn't mean what it originally did. I want to know if the book to which the OP refers deals with this confuscation of the term or not. If it doesn't, reading about a political philosophy that no longer means what it used to mean isn't going to give much insight into U.S. foreign policy. Quit being such a....a...DinoDoc |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|