General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
God might be interested in our questions if....
If God had a name, what would it be And would you call it to his face If you were faced with him in all his glory What would you ask if you had just one question And yeah yeah God is great yeah yeah God is good yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah What if God was one of us Just a slob like one of us Just a stranger on the bus Trying to make his way home If God had a face what would it look like And would you want to see If seeing meant that you would have to believe In things like heaven and in jesus and the saints and all the prophets And yeah yeah god is great yeah yeah god is good yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah What if God was one of us Just a slob like one of us Just a stranger on the bus Trying to make his way home He's trying to make his way home Back up to heaven all alone Nobody calling on the phone Except for the pope maybe in rome And yeah yeah God is great yeah yeah God is good yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah What if god was one of us Just a slob like one of us Just a stranger on the bus Trying to make his way home Just trying to make his way home Like a holy rolling stone Back up to heaven all alone Just trying to make his way home Nobody calling on the phone Except for the pope maybe in rome |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Originally posted by Blake
Man shalt not dictate to God whether God exists or not, God shalt exist and not exist as he darned well pleases. The obvious problem here would seem to be that when God (we will call it God, although it may be a Goddess) is in a hypothetical state of non-existance, how does a non-existant entity then decide to exist again? To make such a decision they must in some sense exist. Hence God can not exist and not exist as he/she/it/they darned well pleases without redefining the meaning of the word 'exist'. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponen...the_zero_power
The evaluation of 0^0 presents a problem, because different mathematical reasoning leads to different results. The best choice for its value depends on the context. According to Benson (1999), "The choice whether to define 00 is based on convenience, not on correctness."[2] There are two principal treatments in practice, one from discrete mathematics and the other from analysis. In many settings, especially in foundations and combinatorics, 0^0 is defined to be 1. This definition arises in foundational treatments of the natural numbers as finite cardinals, and is useful for shortening combinatorial identities and removing special cases from theorems, as illustrated below. In many other settings, 0^0 is left undefined. In calculus, 0^0 is an indeterminate form, which must be analyzed rather than evaluated. In general, mathematical analysis treats 0^0 as undefined[3] in order that the exponential function be continuous. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|