LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-12-2007, 01:26 AM   #1
emily

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default Guess who has the biggest bombs of them all NOW?
Unlike a nuclear weapon, the bomb doesn't hurt the environment, he added.

emily is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:28 AM   #2
Teareerah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
It's not nuclear! And it is twice as powerfull as Nagasaki.
Teareerah is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:30 AM   #3
MedicineForUs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
It's not nuclear and this is impressive because... ?
MedicineForUs is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:32 AM   #4
scemHeish

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Play along Pekka. The Russian ego is bruised.
scemHeish is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:34 AM   #5
ceagsoosy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
Is it satellite-guided like MOAB?
ceagsoosy is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:35 AM   #6
metrocartockasur

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
633
Senior Member
Default
It was Russians who discoverd LASER first.
Go to Wiki.
metrocartockasur is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:38 AM   #7
markbila

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DanS
Is it satellite-guided like MOAB? I think yes.
markbila is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:40 AM   #8
Cabinanteerip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Pekka
Thanks for making the world safer with a new bomb You are welcome.
Cabinanteerip is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:43 AM   #9
seervezex

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Serb
It was Russians who discoverd LASER first.
Go to Wiki. History

[edit] Foundations

In 1917, Albert Einstein in his paper Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung (On the Quantum Theory of Radiation), laid the foundation for the invention of the laser and its predecessor, the maser, in a ground-breaking rederivation of Max Planck's law of radiation based on the concepts of probability coefficients (later to be termed 'Einstein coefficients') for the absorption, spontaneous, and stimulated emission.

In 1928, Rudolph W. Landenburg confirmed the existence of stimulated emission and negative absorption.[3]

In 1939, Valentin A. Fabrikant (USSR) predicted the use of stimulated emission to amplify "short" waves.[4]

In 1947, Willis E. Lamb and R. C. Retherford found apparent stimulated emission in hydrogen spectra and made the first demonstration of stimulated emission.[5]

In 1950, Alfred Kastler (Nobel Prize for Physics 1966) proposed the method of optical pumping, which was experimentally confirmed by Brossel, Kastler and Winter two years later.[6]

The first working laser was demonstrated in May 1960 by Theodore Maiman at Hughes Research Laboratories.
seervezex is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 01:48 AM   #10
kuklame

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
Now back to the topic:

KABOOM!!!
kuklame is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 02:11 AM   #11
Jellowstrom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
Too bad American planes would shoot the Russki plane down before it has a chance to drop it
Jellowstrom is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 02:17 AM   #12
QvhhbjLy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Serb
In your dreams! 9 mediocre jets vs. Several hundred top of the line ones?
QvhhbjLy is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 02:21 AM   #13
Ifroham4

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,196
Senior Member
Default
A bit more detailed article about the bomb:

http://fe26.news.sp1.yahoo.com/s/nm/...ssia_bomb_dc_3;_ylt=AsxB0ee_hmic8DxwOcaqA3tbbBAF

Still can't find video.
Ifroham4 is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 02:25 AM   #14
hasasnn2345tv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
44 kilotons? Or 44 tons? There's a difference.
hasasnn2345tv is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 02:36 AM   #15
STYWOMBORGOSY

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Sarxis
44 kilotons? Or 44 tons? There's a difference. Ooops.
STYWOMBORGOSY is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 02:40 AM   #16
JediReturns84

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
Liquid armor sounds cool, do you have any pics of that?
JediReturns84 is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 02:58 AM   #17
FrereeDoulley

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
424
Senior Member
Default
Is thread about penises?
FrereeDoulley is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 04:58 AM   #18
DiatryDal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
Jesus, Serb, you're like Chekov.
DiatryDal is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 05:11 AM   #19
plalleste

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
579
Senior Member
Default
As Doc said, this bomb isn;t even close to what a small nuke would do - chemical explosives simply can't match the energies you get from nuclear fission or fusion.

As for not hurting the environment, I doubt the environment in the bombs blast radius is "unharmed". Otherwise, its a rather stupid device.
plalleste is offline


Old 09-12-2007, 05:20 AM   #20
gopsbousperie

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
So the Russkies are back to compensating for their deficiencies in average dick size?
gopsbousperie is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:14 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity