[bloriMal]

Dayum. I would have guessed Patrick Kennedy in the first batch.

[iDzcs7TU]

The reason is that it is somewhat hypocritical for groups that promote abstinence, family values, not giving condoms to africa, etc etc to be exposed doing this.

Not that we didn't already know this but America is plainly currently ruled by an elite who seem totally shocked when they find out that the law applies to them same as 'little folks'.

Otherwise no problem.

Tar and feather the hypocrites.

[mrllxp]

Yep...

As the Bush administration's so-called "AIDS czar," Tobias was criticized for emphasizing faithfulness and abstinence over condom use to prevent the spread of AIDS. http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/..._official.html

[southernplayer99]

hookers

[Yarikoff]

It's interesting. The first thread had a totally different crowd so far (save Ogie). Y'all must be the weekend non-North American crowd.

[acceraStoof]

This guy was CEO I think, at Lilly here in Indianapolis, so this story is huge here, on all the nightly news and papers. Funny stuff.

Lots of cracks about Cialis...

[Opislossy]

This is a reason to resign??? Who cares!

QFT

[Jifyicyfuhpop]

So basically any Democrat should be allowed to sleep with hookers consequence free, but any Republican should be tar and feathered for it. That's a textbook case of hackery right there... good show!

[GenryDont]

Originally posted by Oerdin
Not really. Basically, it was this guy's job to make sure US food assistance made it to people suffering from famine. Definitely on the side of angels.

[pouslytut]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
So basically any Democrat should be allowed to sleep with hookers consequence free, but any Republican should be tar and feathered for it. That's a textbook case of hackery right there... good show! If a Republican doesn't take part in the which hunt against gays, or demonizing sex, or (like most of the Republicans in Congress) attacking their opponents for either having sex or getting a BJ while they themselves have mistresses or visit hookers... Then those people aren't hypocrites and should worry. If someone is actively trying to position themselves as a family values candidate and they're cheating on their wives then, yes, they should be exposed.

The hackery here is coming from you. Anyone who attacks others for not living up to their own standards of "decency" should have their faces rubbed in it when they're exposed for doing the same. It just so happens that the Republican Party has spent the last decade grandstanding on this issue and then later being exposed as lying pieces of dog crap. Thus I enjoy seeing their discomfort more.

[shiciapsisy]

The hackery here is coming from you.



All I've said is that the puritanical witchhunts you Americans engage in all the time are absurd.

[StanWatts]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
The hackery here is coming from you.



All I've said is that the puritanical witchhunts you Americans engage in all the time are absurd. No more absurd than abstinance-only sex education, though.

[EmpaccalGah]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
The hackery here is coming from you.

All I've said is that the puritanical witchhunts you Americans engage in all the time are absurd. No. You defined it as hackery when I said hypocracy should be exposed. It just so happens that Republicans are the hypocrites on this issue.

[lodsemelf]

No. You defined it as hackery when I said hypocracy should be exposed. It just so happens that Republicans are the hypocrites on this issue.

And it just so happens that the Republicans are always the hypocrites in the Oerdin-verse...

[Pdarassenko]

Originally posted by Oerdin
Democrats have made things easier for themselves by not engaging in this hypocracy to begin with. Too easy.

[Voitramma]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
So basically any Democrat should be allowed to sleep with hookers consequence free, but any Republican should be tar and feathered for it. That's a textbook case of hackery right there... good show! Wow! That came out of nowhere. No one has made any claim close to that. Is it so bad that you need to resort to the old Republican standby without cause?

[D6b2v1HA]

Wow! That came out of nowhere. No one has made any claim close to that.



Are you blind?

Originally posted by Oerdin
As it is I see nothing wrong with a guy seeing a hooker just as long as she isn't being trafficed and forced into taking part. If everyone is there of their own free will then it's fine. That said if a guy is part of an organization which spends a lot of time demonizing sex, attacking their opponent for getting a BJ, preaching "family values", etc... If that type of person gets caught with a hooker then they should be fully exposed for the frauds they are.

[Marat]

Well, the "organization which spends a lot of time demonizing sex, attacking their opponent for getting a BJ, preaching "family values", etc..." is obviously the GOP. Since Oerdin sees "nothing wrong with a guy seeing a hooker" as long as they aren't a part of said organization, he must think its ok for Democrats to pick up hookers, but not Republicans.

[Overlord]

Ah, so this is more of what you assume other people are thinking.

[UlceskLialels]

Dude, what happened to you? You used to be a decent poster...