North Korea says it will stage nuke test - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**6M8PJigS** · 10-03-2006, 05:03 PM

Alas! Now it's only a matter of time until they complete their sinister plan to launch nuclear-tipped missiles and crash them into the Pacific Ocean.

**Creelaleps** · 10-03-2006, 05:27 PM

People who inhabit the area don't seem thrilled.

**KaterinaNJq** · 10-03-2006, 05:33 PM

**10traistintarry** · 10-03-2006, 07:46 PM

Originally posted by LordShiva
In Soviet Russia, nuclear bomb tests YOU!

**ehib8yPc** · 10-03-2006, 08:24 PM

Originally posted by Tattila the Hun
US needs to find out exactly when and where the test is being held, and drop the biggest bomb they got in their arsenal to that place as the try theirs. With any luck, Dear Leader is watching and gets vaporized in this freak nuclear accident.

Or borrow the Tzar Bomb from russians.

Originally posted by Lorizael
Whoa. Wow. I really was not expecting anyone to have the same idea. Man. Now I have nothing to contribute to this thread.

**encumeterz** · 10-03-2006, 09:48 PM

Darius

**Nemerov** · 10-03-2006, 10:14 PM

Originally posted by Tattila the Hun
Damn! Never thought it would lead to that... Well, say bye to your goldfish, this is the big one.

Hold on, "stage a nuke test"? Doesn't staging mean fake, or make-believe? A test in school gauges your progress. This is a test. There is no announced target, but their intent is to fire another nuke, as a test of progress.

**imnaone** · 10-04-2006, 12:26 AM

Send a Spy over to sabotage production?

**timgreyuvcz** · 10-04-2006, 01:29 AM

Conduct.

**Acrogeokickic** · 10-04-2006, 01:43 AM

Periods are funny now? Is this a cute reference to some smutty feminist comedienne's that-time-of-the-month routine, or some PoMo thing I'm missing?

**leoto5Fm** · 10-04-2006, 05:07 AM

Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Periods are what happen when you quote a post consisting of an attached image.

I'd better stop that, then!

**BamSaitinypap** · 10-04-2006, 05:20 AM

Originally posted by Tattila the Hun
US needs to find out exactly when and where the test is being held, and drop the biggest bomb they got in their arsenal to that place as the try theirs. With any luck, Dear Leader is watching and gets vaporized in this freak nuclear accident.

Or borrow the Tzar Bomb from russians.

the test most likely is underground. bombs can't do anything to underground shelters.

even nukes can't destroy underground testing areas. If they could, what would be the point of putting the nuke underground to test it?

Not to mention it would be an act of war on the United States' part.

**Appeselve** · 10-04-2006, 05:26 AM

I think we need to look at why these nations develop nukes. It seems pretty simple. They devlop nukes to prevent the United States from attacking them. It's defensive move on their part.

Would the United States have attacked Iraq if they had nukes? Unlikely. Same with Afghanistan.

I think these nations have the right to develop nukes. They have a right to defend themselves from american agression.

What scares me is the proliferation and the risk these things can get into the hands of terrorists. I'm just afraid someone will nuke my city because they think we are a bunch of sinners. I have never sinned. I can't find a woman to sin with.

**swoluelvede** · 10-04-2006, 05:33 AM

Originally posted by SlowwHand
They already fired some that landed in the sea. Those were just missiles (with no warheads).

**NodePark** · 10-04-2006, 05:35 AM

Originally posted by SlowwHand
Yes. USA, nation of aggression and hostile takeover.
We don't have "lands" all over the world. come one

you cant go for 3 years without bombing some country

**Caunnysup** · 10-04-2006, 05:40 AM

we're still holding onto Iraq.

And it has been 3 years since we bombed a country. it's been over 3 years since the Iraq war.

But speaking of... I think it's high time we bomb someone else. there's nothing good on tv right now.

**Raj_Copi_Jin** · 10-04-2006, 05:44 AM

Originally posted by SlowwHand
B) What have we "taken over" and held on to any land or resources?
Try never.

Well, I'll let the history buffs correct you in detail, but at the very least that needs to be amended to "not too recently." We took this whole damned country by force, after all. Then there are cases such as the Philippines...

**RsQhyZyR** · 10-04-2006, 05:56 AM

yep, he is paranoid enough to believe the U.S. will attack him (even if we have no intention of doing so).

The scary part is what will happen to the nukes once they are built. We have no way of knowing if he will sell them, or they they aren't guarded properly (especially problematic when the goverment collapses). Scary stuff.

**BreeveKambmak** · 10-04-2006, 06:02 AM

We have a base in the Phillipines, but it's not occupation.

Mexico is lucky Texas doesn't want them.

**Serereids** · 10-04-2006, 06:17 AM

Originally posted by SlowwHand
We have a base in the Phillipines, but it's not occupation.

Mexico is lucky Texas doesn't want them. So you agree you were wrong then about taking other people's land.

10-03-2006, 05:03 PM	#1
6M8PJigS Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 439 Senior Member	North Korea says it will stage nuke test Alas! Now it's only a matter of time until they complete their sinister plan to launch nuclear-tipped missiles and crash them into the Pacific Ocean. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-03-2006, 05:27 PM	#2
Creelaleps Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 356 Senior Member	People who inhabit the area don't seem thrilled. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-03-2006, 05:33 PM	#3
KaterinaNJq Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 439 Senior Member	Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-03-2006, 07:46 PM	#4
10traistintarry Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 385 Senior Member	Originally posted by LordShiva In Soviet Russia, nuclear bomb tests YOU! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-03-2006, 08:24 PM	#5
ehib8yPc Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 564 Senior Member	Originally posted by Tattila the Hun US needs to find out exactly when and where the test is being held, and drop the biggest bomb they got in their arsenal to that place as the try theirs. With any luck, Dear Leader is watching and gets vaporized in this freak nuclear accident. Or borrow the Tzar Bomb from russians. Originally posted by Lorizael Whoa. Wow. I really was not expecting anyone to have the same idea. Man. Now I have nothing to contribute to this thread. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-03-2006, 09:48 PM	#6
encumeterz Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 542 Senior Member	Darius Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-03-2006, 10:14 PM	#7
Nemerov Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 456 Senior Member	Originally posted by Tattila the Hun Damn! Never thought it would lead to that... Well, say bye to your goldfish, this is the big one. Hold on, "stage a nuke test"? Doesn't staging mean fake, or make-believe? A test in school gauges your progress. This is a test. There is no announced target, but their intent is to fire another nuke, as a test of progress. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 12:26 AM	#8
imnaone Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 365 Senior Member	Send a Spy over to sabotage production? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 01:29 AM	#9
timgreyuvcz Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 370 Senior Member	Conduct. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 01:43 AM	#10
Acrogeokickic Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 398 Senior Member	Periods are funny now? Is this a cute reference to some smutty feminist comedienne's that-time-of-the-month routine, or some PoMo thing I'm missing? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 05:07 AM	#11
leoto5Fm Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 434 Senior Member	Originally posted by Kuciwalker Periods are what happen when you quote a post consisting of an attached image. I'd better stop that, then! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 05:20 AM	#12
BamSaitinypap Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 502 Senior Member	Originally posted by Tattila the Hun US needs to find out exactly when and where the test is being held, and drop the biggest bomb they got in their arsenal to that place as the try theirs. With any luck, Dear Leader is watching and gets vaporized in this freak nuclear accident. Or borrow the Tzar Bomb from russians. the test most likely is underground. bombs can't do anything to underground shelters. even nukes can't destroy underground testing areas. If they could, what would be the point of putting the nuke underground to test it? Not to mention it would be an act of war on the United States' part. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 05:26 AM	#13
Appeselve Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 520 Senior Member	I think we need to look at why these nations develop nukes. It seems pretty simple. They devlop nukes to prevent the United States from attacking them. It's defensive move on their part. Would the United States have attacked Iraq if they had nukes? Unlikely. Same with Afghanistan. I think these nations have the right to develop nukes. They have a right to defend themselves from american agression. What scares me is the proliferation and the risk these things can get into the hands of terrorists. I'm just afraid someone will nuke my city because they think we are a bunch of sinners. I have never sinned. I can't find a woman to sin with. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 05:33 AM	#14
swoluelvede Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 358 Senior Member	Originally posted by SlowwHand They already fired some that landed in the sea. Those were just missiles (with no warheads). Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 05:35 AM	#15
NodePark Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 500 Senior Member	Originally posted by SlowwHand Yes. USA, nation of aggression and hostile takeover. We don't have "lands" all over the world. come one you cant go for 3 years without bombing some country Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

10-04-2006, 05:40 AM	#16
Caunnysup Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 470 Senior Member	we're still holding onto Iraq. And it has been 3 years since we bombed a country. it's been over 3 years since the Iraq war. But speaking of... I think it's high time we bomb someone else. there's nothing good on tv right now. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 05:44 AM	#17
Raj_Copi_Jin Join Date Oct 2005 Age 48 Posts 4,533 Senior Member	Originally posted by SlowwHand B) What have we "taken over" and held on to any land or resources? Try never. Well, I'll let the history buffs correct you in detail, but at the very least that needs to be amended to "not too recently." We took this whole damned country by force, after all. Then there are cases such as the Philippines... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 05:56 AM	#18
RsQhyZyR Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 432 Senior Member	yep, he is paranoid enough to believe the U.S. will attack him (even if we have no intention of doing so). The scary part is what will happen to the nukes once they are built. We have no way of knowing if he will sell them, or they they aren't guarded properly (especially problematic when the goverment collapses). Scary stuff. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 06:02 AM	#19
BreeveKambmak Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 382 Senior Member	We have a base in the Phillipines, but it's not occupation. Mexico is lucky Texas doesn't want them. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-04-2006, 06:17 AM	#20
Serereids Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 423 Senior Member	Originally posted by SlowwHand We have a base in the Phillipines, but it's not occupation. Mexico is lucky Texas doesn't want them. So you agree you were wrong then about taking other people's land. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote