General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
06-10-2006, 12:16 PM | #1 |
|
|
|
06-10-2006, 12:43 PM | #2 |
|
Support given by the USA (especially the Stingers)
Partisan tactics with strong support from the population Partisan leaders which were trained in modern guerilla tactics thanks to the support of the CIA (Osama bin Laden being one of them) Lots of terrain good suited for guerilla tactics with the mujahedeen having full knowledge of the terrain (whereas the sovjets had only limited knowledge about it) |
|
06-10-2006, 01:44 PM | #4 |
|
|
|
06-10-2006, 03:11 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
06-10-2006, 05:50 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
06-10-2006, 08:50 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
06-10-2006, 08:59 PM | #9 |
|
Originally posted by germanos
Offcourse communism (well, Soviet style at least) is notoriously centralised which didn't help the Soviet case. What pissed off the locals was not the Communists running things centrally. They were fine with that for four years until the Communists decided to go and do something, well, communist, like passing equal rights for women. Then the reactionaries got all pissed off and revolted. The CIA said, hey, we can lay a trap for the Soviets and began supporting this minor insurgency. Six months later, in come the Soviets, and the rest is history. |
|
06-10-2006, 10:21 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
06-11-2006, 12:51 AM | #12 |
|
|
|
06-11-2006, 01:01 AM | #13 |
|
Has probably also something to do with the modern weapons/equipment employed.
The best Equipment the Taliban have is probably more than 15 years old and they don´t get much support anymore (maybe there are still enough recruits, but there won´t be much supply in modern weapons anymore [and I doubt many of the local warlords have an interest in helping the Taliban to power again]) whereas the US and Allied troops use state of the art equipment (among them unmanned drones which make it easier to observe regions without having to risk soldiers) which also negates the advantage of the remaining Stingers the Taliban might still have. |
|
06-11-2006, 01:25 AM | #14 |
|
|
|
06-11-2006, 04:43 AM | #15 |
|
|
|
06-11-2006, 05:45 AM | #16 |
|
Originally posted by Lancer
So, what went wrong? Gorbachev. Soviets didn't fail in Afghanistan. It was Gorbachev who screw-up the entire USSR. Withdrawal from Afghanistan was a logical move for Gorby's sh!tty leadership on his way to collapse of the entire country. HE WAS A SUCKER, while the military did their job just fine. |
|
06-11-2006, 09:25 AM | #18 |
|
|
|
06-11-2006, 09:45 AM | #19 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|