General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
By... Randism, do you mean Objectivism?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Originally posted by Q Cubed
By... Randism, do you mean Objectivism? I use the name they find annoying. JM |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
... raging, bug-eyed sociopathy can be passed off as a credible and pragmatic way of running a nation. They're usually boys with varying degrees of Aspergers, who are so preoccupied with preserving the crystalline perfection of their own internal logic that they fail to spot that when viewed as a whole their philosophy is barking mad. Quoted For Pith. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
![]() Sorry Elok. You're right, it's unfair to associate Asperger's and sociopathy. I can't imagine why we would necessarily sympathize with Objectivism. I wasn't making a statement about Rand. Don't know who they are. Couldn't care less about one more American political whacko. The statement simply appealed to me in a more general sense in terms of ... people "who are so preoccupied with preserving the crystalline perfection of their own internal logic that they fail to spot that when viewed as a whole their philosophy is barking mad." I like it, it's concise. It neatly sums up how I feel about some 'coherent systems of thought.' I didn't see it as disparaging genuine sufferers of Asperger's. Sorry for the mistake and thanks for setting me straight. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
Originally posted by Agathon
Works for most politicians. They're all gits. If you want to emulate them, go fill your boots. Just don't expect a round of applause from those sections of the community who have not yet whored their brains, hearts, souls and arses to the forces of darkness. You might stop ripping off Viz first. But that's unlikely. You've lost the plot, haven't you? Go on- see if you can find some other unconnected smear tactic in lieu of anything actually credible. You've already alienated both sides of this particular debate so it's not as if you've got anything to lose. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|