[skiboyx]

Lou dobbstein retired.

They always leave at least one puppet in place so we can feel represented in the media.

i was saying, that dobbstein WAS controlled opposition as his entire audience was drawn in on his anti illegal immigration stance ,which ,when it came to getting a new job he 100% REVERSED his so called principals on the issue. def controlled zio stooge. the judge? well if any msm outlet hires him OR he changes then,yes hes owned...but if not, the sheenies were just cleaning house.

[peveballery]

i was saying, that dobbstein WAS controlled opposition as his entire audience was drawn in on his anti illegal immigration stance ,which ,when it came to getting a new job he 100% REVERSED his so called principals on the issue. def controlled zio stooge. the judge? well if any msm outlet hires him OR he changes then,yes hes owned...but if not, the sheenies were just cleaning house.

They don't need to clean house, they don't put goys in positions of influence in the first place. They do understand the need to fill voids. That's what Dobbs and Napolitano do. What if they didn't fill these voids? The masters of information control have asked themselves that question....and these guys are the answer.
Dobbs and nappy may dissapear, or one of them may appear as a political candidate and the goyim will flock to him.

My question in post #16 remains unanswered: WHY do you people think FOX gave Napolitano as much publicity as they did?

[skiboyx]

if he reappears in the msm then your right, if they airbrush him from memory,then not. i know they control everything media.....but thats not to say everyone who works for them KNOWS what the real beliefs of their bosses are...they act out of subtilty and deceit as naturally as a serpent....time will tell and im too jaded to hope anymore.

[weightpillsnow]

WHY do you people think FOX gave Napolitano as much publicity as they did

1) To gauge the opposition. It was simply a litmus test.

2) For the Money. Freedom is popular!

[peveballery]

1) To gauge the opposition. It was simply a litmus test.

I'm not sure I know what you mean.
2) For the Money. Freedom is popular! They have the power to issue trillions out of thin air. Media isn't a business they use to make money, it's a tool they use to maintain the Federal Reserve and keep secrets.

[weightpillsnow]

Originally Posted by BabushkaLady
1) To gauge the opposition. It was simply a litmus test.

I'm not sure I know what you mean. In other terms: If you notice the sheep aren't eating the food you've been feeding them year after year, put something out and see if they bite.

The Judge's show was very popular. I don't believe he is controlled opposition--most likely just a tool used by FBN.

The RP Revolution is growing everyday; Fox knows it; "They" know it. This won't stop just because RP doesn't win the nomination. NDAA and every other plan is their pre-emptive strike at the Freedom Movement.

2) For the Money. Freedom is popular!

They have the power to issue trillions out of thin air. Media isn't a business they use to make money, it's a tool they use to maintain the Federal Reserve and keep secrets. Fox is still a FOR PROFIT business. Ratings and money go hand in hand.

Fox may be a puppet for "They"; but Fox still has shareholders.

Your original question:
Originally Posted by hoarder
WHY do you people think FOX gave Napolitano as much publicity as they did

[dr-eavealer]

Freedom watch was one big Ron Paul commercial.

To what end....Idk...

[suidinguilelf]

Now that the judge is gone, maybe it's time for Ron Paul to step aside or anyone else that speaks this nonsense of freedom, liberty and constitution?
That way all the Khazar worshipping Fox Christian conservatives can rally together and chant for death and slaughter of innocent people that have never attacked us.
Let's kick this Christian conservative death machine for Israel into high gear!

[Calluffence]

I sent an email to the person who decided to cut the Napolitano.
Couldn't hurt and letting them know people were watching.

irena.briganti@foxnews.com

I ask you to reconsider canceling Judge Napolitano's show.
It is among the very few shows on any Fox network that I make a point to watch.

In fact I suggest you broadcast it on the regular Fox channel as well as Business channel.

It is alarming to me that among all the dreck Fox broadcasts, the Judge's show, a very high quality presentation,
is the one Fox decides to remove.

It appears you are attempting to limit useful information about the mis-governing of the US being shown.

This is either a very, very poor decision or outright shameful conduct on your part.

I ask you to reverse this cancellation.

[suidinguilelf]

I sent an email to the person who decided to cut the Napolitano.
Couldn't hurt and letting them know people were watching.

irena.briganti@foxnews.com

I ask you to reconsider canceling Judge Napolitano's show.
It is among the very few shows on any Fox network that I make a point to watch.

In fact I suggest you broadcast it on the regular Fox channel as well as Business channel.

It is alarming to me that among all the dreck Fox broadcasts, the Judge's show, a very high quality presentation,
is the one Fox decides to remove.

It appears you are attempting to limit useful information about the mis-governing of the US being shown.

This is either a very, very poor decision or outright shameful conduct on your part.

I ask you to reverse this cancellation.

The show didn't serve their purpose. It was a good business decision to cancel it.