[Unergerah]

But I apparently can't spell (based on what I see in the Title).

I found 2 explanations that seem to make sense as far as when happened before the Big Bang and how the universe and existence actually ends. Time and space are highly related (spacetime concept) and Hawkins suggests that there was no time before the Big Bang and it was actually developing just as space was developing. At the begging there was very very little time.

We also know that quantum physics exists, its not sci-fi and random occurences do not contradict the laws of physics. So, there was nothing and then there was light. (I don't believe in God, but is it a coincidence that the Bible begins like similar to this?)

We also know the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate and we actually going to lose signs of each other. That would create complete cooling and everything would just die/end. Wouldn't all the rocks/star & planet remains in space completely deteriorate? Wouldn't that in turn, somehow, get rid of dark energy and dark matter? (I am not sure if the whole idea of opening a worm-whole to another universe could re-energize our universe...to me that is the most sci-fi theory out of all I heard.)

And then you just have another Big Bang [thumbup].

[legal-advicer]

Thanks for clearing that up.

[levitratestimon]

the big bang has been happening since b4 time was time, the universe expands to its maximum and then begins to contract and collapse upon itself and when it cant contract anymore boom another big bang...

Simple

[Thomaswhitee]

I'll just call the Nobel committee for you Brat...

[www.forumsovetov.ru]

I could easily disprove your little theory but unfortunately i'm under NDA.

[ptmQqoxw]

42

.........

[kranfid]

2089!!!! Just wait

[tutkarussia]

the big bang has been happening since b4 time was time, the universe expands to its maximum and then begins to contract and collapse upon itself and when it cant contract anymore boom another big bang...

Simple

Well first we would have to prove that time is real or just an idea.

[Vemnagelignc]

We also know the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate and we actually going to lose signs of each other

Why would we lose "signs of each other"?

That would create complete cooling and everything would just die/end. Eventually all stellar processes will cease but it's at least 5 billion years before our Sun, so by that time, mankind will have either died out or figured out a way of travelling to other stars and galaxies - the latter of which there are hundreds of thousands of millions, each packed full of nebulous regions that are still in the process of creating new stars. These, in turn, will continue to generate heat, light and elements for billions upon billions of years. Naturally, all nuclear processes will stop at some point in the future but it's not actually 'The End'.

Wouldn't all the rocks/star & planet remains in space completely deteriorate? No - they'd end up very cold and, at the moment, there is no compelling evidence for the decay of protons and electrons (and if there is, their half-lives would be in the order of at least 10^34 years), so the matter would remain indefinitely.

Wouldn't that in turn, somehow, get rid of dark energy and dark matter? Err, how/why?

And then you just have another Big Bang [thumbup]. Err, how/why?

Methinks your understanding of how the universe works needs a few more details - especially in the latter parts.

[Preegovesem]

I blame the noob.

[Aeaefee]

Methinks your understanding of how the universe works needs a few more details - especially in the latter parts.

Me thinks the OP needs to take a high school physics course, or at least watch the first episode of Sagan's Cosmos.

[levitratestimon]

Well first we would have to prove that time is real or just an idea.

I bet if someone did have the real true answer, no one would agree on it