[AliceFromHouston]

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/webs...ting-yout.html


With a banning on illegal activities or controversial activities like salvia, and banning of "terrorist" activities, imo, all it seems like will happen is give a company a sweet chance to over take Youtube.

Next you know they will be banning anyone who has videos of illegal lane changes, illegal speeding, ect. ect.

I wonder if this will end up going through. If they do ban things like these, all they are going to do is give money to other people. Only thing youtube will be good for is copyrighted material.


If they do ban videos I wouldn't really understand. Youtube is owned by Google, and yet you could still go to google.com, and look up the same exact things and find similar videos on other sites. Just wouldn't make any sense.

[sjdflghd]

no.
.
.
.