[stuck_in_WA]

Ok this is a beta version, kindly coded by rtk over at mozzillazine forums

http://userstyles.org/style/show/1473

You need firefox and stylish extension from the site. It needs a bit of tweaking, cause the private message section appears to be missing atm.

[crestorinfo]

So uhm did you ask the mods if this is o,k with them ?
I mean all in all FM´s trying to make money with the adds and your posting a workaround.

[stuck_in_WA]

So uhm did you ask the mods if this is o,k with them ?
I mean all in all FM´s trying to make money with the adds and your posting a workaround.

I removed the adblock code here, besides it is no different to using adblock

Paste over the code:

@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

@-moz-document url-prefix(http://futuremark.com/forum/) {

/* expand width */
td:first-child[width="50%"], td:last-child[width="50%"],
td[width="967"] > a, td[width="967"] > a + br, /* top logo */
td[valign="bottom"], /* bottom logo and stuff */
td[style*="/layout/edge_"], img[src*="/layout/edge_"]
{display: none !important;}

td[width="967"] {
width: 100% !important;
min-width: 967px !important;
background: none !important;
}
td[width="967"] table[cellpadding="0"] {
margin: auto !important;
}

}

[MediconStop]

Ok this is a beta version, kindly coded by rtk over at mozzillazine forums

http://userstyles.org/style/show/1473

You need firefox and stylish extension from the site. It needs a bit of tweaking, cause the private message section appears to be missing atm.

Completely, utterly, useless.

[stuck_in_WA]

Completely, utterly, useless.

really [rofl] its a BETA, I am in the process of tweaking and talking with the maker. [dots]

[chuecfafresslds]

Completely, utterly, useless.

I'm with you on this one.

[oB8LI2kP]

So uhm did you ask the mods if this is o,k with them ?
I mean all in all FM´s trying to make money with the adds and your posting a workaround.

Sorry, but there is nothing wrong with ad block. Come on Dan....

[JonnLeejsp]

FM's girth is pretty unimpressive, the wider the better.

[crestorinfo]

Sorry, but there is nothing wrong with ad block. Come on Dan....

no probs from my side,
btw i don´t have any ads here at all
Pro User ftw [thumbup]

[stuck_in_WA]

Ok, some more tweaking:

Use this code:

@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

@-moz-document url-prefix(http://futuremark.com/forum/) {

/* expand width */
td:first-child[width="50%"], td:last-child[width="50%"],
td[style*="/layout/edge_"], img[src*="/layout/edge_"]
{display: none !important;}

td[width="967"] {
width: 100% !important;
min-width: 967px !important;
background: none !important;
}
td[width="967"] table[cellpadding="0"] {
margin: auto !important;
}

} Then use adblock NOT to block ad's, but rather two background images, so it dont look so crappy

http://futuremark.com/images/layout/page_bg.gif
http://futuremark.com/images/layout/page_top.jpg

[skupaemauto]

http://www.futuremark.com/forum/show...26&postcount=8

[stuck_in_WA]

http://www.futuremark.com/forum/show...26&postcount=8

Edit it in manage styles and use my altered code above [thumbup]

[skupaemauto]

Edit it in manage styles and use my altered code above [thumbup]

ye same error..

edit: hm no more errors now (i restarted firefox) but it's still not widescreen :S

[stuck_in_WA]

ye same error..

edit: hm no more errors now (i restarted firefox) but it's still not widescreen :S

Try on a clean profile?

This is how it looks atm for me:

[skupaemauto]

Try on a clean profile?

nah i fixed it..
The code said http://futuremark.com/forum/* yet my bookmark links to http://www.futuremark.com/forum

[doolarsva]

Try on a clean profile?

This is how it looks atm for me:

....which proves our point exactly. If we left the forums unlocked, it would look complete and utter **** with the rest of the layout [thumbdown]

[stuck_in_WA]

....which proves our point exactly. If we left the forums unlocked, it would look complete and utter **** with the rest of the layout [thumbdown]

Thats more to do with how the site is coded

Besides with a bit of tweaking I WILL prove you guys wrong All it needs atm is the logo centered, plus the subforum fix [yes]

[KaterinaNJq]

Blimey, I wonder why people even bother with widescreen when they dont make use of the additional space. I couldnt imagine having a forum open to full screen on my LCD with its native resolution of 2560x1600

Still, I guess there are those who want it....

[doolarsva]

Blimey, I wonder why people even bother with widescreen when they dont make use of the additional space. I couldnt imagine having a forum open to full screen on my LCD with its native resolution of 2560x1600

Still, I guess there are those who want it....

Thats what we all think. People who get higher resolution monitors, usually use the space properly, not to have 1 page maximised

Besides with a bit of tweaking I WILL prove you guys wrong

You wont, dont you worry

[icyfreshy]

Thats more to do with how the site is coded

Besides with a bit of tweaking I WILL prove you guys wrong All it needs atm is the logo centered, plus the subforum fix [yes]

LOL after all thise tweaking, all you've done is managed to take the bars of background on the left and right, and replaced them with an off white centre. What a waste of time. For this to be of any benefit, you'd need them to change the rules on image sizes etc...

Seeing as they stay quite strict on this, I don't see the point in bothering. Oh and I have a 20" widescreen 1680x1050, in dual display. Maximise is very much not needed for the web. Maximise and Web is only for porn.