LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-10-2011, 06:13 PM   #1
ticskebasse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
482
Senior Member
Default Vatican says gays are undeserving of basic human rights.
I think they know pedophilia when they see it. And they definitely recognize that societies have the right to prosecute those who engage in it for the common good.
ticskebasse is offline


Old 07-10-2011, 06:17 PM   #2
FUNALA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
That's not really an argument, Herr Doctor.
FUNALA is offline


Old 07-10-2011, 07:51 PM   #3
soydaykam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
China and Russia objected too. See? The Vatican is in good company here.
Our foreign minister, who is gay, said the same. But he meant the vote about the Libya thing..../worthless bit of anecdotic info
soydaykam is offline


Old 07-10-2011, 07:58 PM   #4
heltduell

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Probably
heltduell is offline


Old 07-10-2011, 08:10 PM   #5
Zaebal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
353
Senior Member
Default
If it's self-victimization wouldn't it make more sense to compare it to suicide? Or possibly things like incest and adultery. Comparing it to pedophilia? Really?
Zaebal is offline


Old 07-10-2011, 08:53 PM   #6
dwestemesse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
What do you mean by basic human rights? The Vatican is clearly stating that it opposes violence against homosexuals. Do you think that getting married is a basic human right?
dwestemesse is offline


Old 07-10-2011, 11:30 PM   #7
vNGiDaFX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
512
Senior Member
Default
In that case the human rights of gays have never been respected during all of mankind's history until some countries legalized gay mariage this past decade.
vNGiDaFX is offline


Old 07-10-2011, 11:49 PM   #8
QuidQuoPro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
597
Senior Member
Default
In that case the human rights of gays have never been respected during all of mankind's history until some countries legalized gay mariage this past decade.
Yes, no, and maybe. Also, did you know that at one time there was no such thing as rights. For anyone!
QuidQuoPro is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:09 AM   #9
Lipitorseffec

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
Yes, the bishops were throwing the Jews right into the Gas Chambers
Lipitorseffec is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:16 AM   #10
StoyaFanst

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
341
Senior Member
Default
Back up.

Is marriage a basic right for anyone?
StoyaFanst is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:20 AM   #11
xFZ3k8Mw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
Back up.

Is marriage a basic right for anyone?
No.

And it has never been so. And it is still not so (Even in states/countries that recognize gay marriage).

And those who argue for gay marriage from the standpoint that it is, make me want to change to be against gay marriage because it would be terrible if marriage was a basic right for anyone.

JM
xFZ3k8Mw is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:28 AM   #12
Peter Hill

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
Because I am against and not a fan of:

1. Marriage where one or more people are very young.
2. Marriage between blood relations.
3. Marriage between more than 2 people.
4. Marriage between a human and a non-human.

And so on....

I think they would be damaging to society. I don't think that 'gay marriage is a slippery slope'. I do think that 'marriage is a fundamental right' has implications though.

JM
Peter Hill is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:39 AM   #13
varrozans

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default
Yes, the bishops were throwing the Jews right into the Gas Chambers
They almost were. The Vatican was telling Catholics it was their duty to report law breakers including Jews, gays, and Gypsies who were trying to hide from the SS. There were dozens of ways they were complicit including money laundering for the Nazis through the Vatican bank since the Vatican wasn't officially at war with the allies.
varrozans is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:46 AM   #14
JNancy46

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
It is also negative to add fundamental rights for everything.

Pretty soon I will have the fundamental right to wear what I want and the fundamental right to drive and so on...

JM
Mating is pretty fundamental to the human animal.
JNancy46 is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:49 AM   #15
Ltftujkg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Mating is pretty fundamental to the human animal.
I definitely don't think we have a fundamental right to mate.

Although I did think some german prisoners were arguing that?

No, it was some german old folks who argued that they should be 'taken care of'?

Anyways, no fundamental right to mate. Obviously if there is no fundamental right to mate, there is no fundamental right to marriage.

JM
Ltftujkg is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:55 AM   #16
Honealals

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
I definitely don't think we have a fundamental right to mate.
I think that is an absurd notion.
Honealals is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 12:58 AM   #17
oplapofffe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
It is also negative to add fundamental rights for everything.

Pretty soon I will have the fundamental right to wear what I want and the fundamental right to drive and so on...

JM
It can be perceived as a fundamental right because it's is closely linked to the fundamental right not be discriminated against (by the state in particular).

If we want to treat each and every person equally, then it makes perfect sense that like heterosexuals, gays should also be given the opportunity to marry.

I'll repeat myself briefly: whereas gay marriage is not a fundamental right (like marriage is not a fundamantal right), in practice it is a human right, namely the right to non-discrimination.
oplapofffe is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 01:04 AM   #18
swwatch

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
Most Catholic priests are gay. You see, instead of letting them marry and form healthy relationships, we just tell them to bottle up their feelings, and then give them unlimited access to children.
swwatch is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 01:13 AM   #19
NumDusthouh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
I'd be a lot more sympathetic to the Catholic opposition to gay marriage if they didn't do ridiculous things like compare homosexuality to violent crime like rape and pedophilia.
NumDusthouh is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 01:19 AM   #20
aAaBecker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
I'm starting a polygamy thread.
aAaBecker is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity