General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
m8, what you do in the end is up to you, Moral: Disabling someone for life is just as bad, if not worse, then shooting them. You may be causing more suffering this way. Legal: If you aimed at his legs, means you were not afraid for your life. Which makes it assault with a deadly weapon, not self-defense. Realistic: When you pull a gun, your opponent will not stand there, looking like a target, waiting for you to carefully aim at his legs. If you can shoot someone who is running at you in the legs accurately, you must be better than any trained force on the face of the Earth, because none of them even consider aiming at such a small moving target, being a shot they could realistically make. Medical: Bullets are lethal. Only in Hollywood movies do people shrug off multiple gunshot wounds. It's stupidly easy to kill someone with a shot to the leg. A severed femoral artery is death in about 2 minutes. A severed popliteal artery is death in 5. Either way, LONG before any medical help could be offered. In the famous Hollywood bank shootout, the robbers were wearing multiple layers of body armor, and ultimately one of them died from being shot in the legs. Like I said, I can see why you think the way you do... and it's noble in some way. But it's just wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
I can see where you're coming from, but you are absolutely wrong on every level. Let me explain. Right or wrong may be more a case of personal morals, social values and local laws. IMO, someone brakes in and they get themselves killed - tough, their choice, their responsability! HOWEVER, there must be a risk as you don't want to shoot a cop or firefighter who's trying to get you out of a burning building, or a family member, or friend, who's dropped in unexpectedly. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
I got my paws on an different pistol 2 weeks ago, and i shot it much much better than my springfield... found one locally setup just how i wanted it at the store... so i sold the XDm.
and got my new H&K USP .40 variant 1. This will be my new gun for IDPA shooting, and hopefully i can get some better scores ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
sweet gun im looking into maybe geting into 10mm Look up Harold Fish. He was a school teacher convicted of murder for using his 10mm gun in self defense. Even though the conviction was not based solely on the ammo he used, it did contribute. The courts considered the 10mm ammo to be excessive for self defense. I believe he did file an appeal and won, but a lot of people still ended up opting for a smaller caliber for self defense because of the conviction. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Be careful with using a 10mm handgun for self defense. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
I got my paws on an different pistol 2 weeks ago, and i shot it much much better than my springfield... found one locally setup just how i wanted it at the store... so i sold the XDm. If I wasn't living in a police state, I'd save up for the mini in 9mm. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
Nice! I'm looking for a new semi-auto pistol. I keep thinking Glock, but just because of reputation not because I've had good experience with them.
________ Cheap Glass Pipes |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|