|
![]() |
#1 |
|
I'm sure many of you will agree that color doesn't matter and that gameness is the fundamental trait of the apbt. However, I've noticed that a lot of wiry built blue dogs are labled as an amstaff or ambully, even though the dog is an apbt pedigree wise and has no resemblance towards an amstaff or ambully. I've also noticed that a lot of rednosed apbts have more wrinkles and appears to have a narrower head than other coat types, but that could be because red is a light color and that the wrinkles are easier seen in a red dog than black, brown, etc. I've also noticed many rednosed apbts automatically be labled gamebred. Now probably the most agreed upon statement I've heard from virtually everyone is that when it comes to merles, the dog is guaranteed a hound mix. Also today as a friend of mine and I were walking our dogs, both apbts, a guy came up to us and said "that is a nice apbt and amstaff." Out of curiosity, we asked him how did he know my dog was an apbt and my friend's dog an amstaff and he replid, "your dog is black and white, clearly an apbt while your friend's dog is a fawn, like all amstaffs." So apparently amstaffs are only fawn, they don't come in brindle, black, etc. So what is everyone's thoughts about this topic? Does color indeed matter?
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|