[Jeaxatoem]

He therefore spent an entire 3/4 of his book to reconstructing an effective new language so that a solid footing could be achieved before delving into his theory. In a similar way, Newton could not mathematically express his ideas coherently so he had to invest calculus to achieve it. I get therefore in principle where this philosophical argument is going, but it appears extreme. Without having to reconstruct our language so we can achieve consensus at some point, any further debate is going to be difficult. :-)) bravo
congratulations someone who knows his stuff
a real thinker