LOGO
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-09-2012, 02:40 PM   #37
Fertassa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
if your words lead to contradictions
then you talk nonsense
'matter'
'the scientific method'
'science'
all nonsense terms

your term is made up of 2 words
"dark" and "matter"

the term matter ends in nonsense
so then does the combined word
"dark matter"
"dark matter" is a nonsense term
How do you arrive at those conclusions.
What would you like to call matter?
Perhaps "solidified energy?

What would you like to call "the scientific method"
Perhaps "process of logical deduction"?

What would you like to call DM?
Perhaps "unobserved solidified energy?"


Not really sure what you are trying to prove, but as far as I'm concerned you can call them whatever you like...The important thing is explaining the physical reality of them and the Universe around us, based on our observations.
You seem to me to miss the "spirit" of science altogether and appear to have some sort of underlying agenda.
Fertassa is offline




« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity