Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
why do you think i like the following naming schema:
478 pentium 4 3.0e ghz socket, processor, speed real easy to understand. unlike: 775 pentium 4 560j. that doesnt tell me much past the socket and processor. 560j = nothing to me... except thats the new schema intel uses. unfortunately, i fucking hate it. and i hear amd is good for gaming ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
the new core 2's are supposed to be better then amd's but that's kind of the reason i want to get some input on them...are their worth the hype or is the bark worse then it's bite? and now there is two individual cores... :tard imagine the water cooling & overclocking... water-fried system ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|