Reply to Thread New Thread |
12-17-2011, 02:37 PM | #1 |
|
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-...b_1153239.html
"He is certainly interesting for his Barry Goldwater approach -- the pre-William F. Buckley, Jerry Falwell, Ronald Reagan conservative. If nothing else he is ideologically pure; a political doppelgänger of the Tea Party faithful, many of which, if under random doses of sodium pentathol would have to admit Gingrich and are closer to Barack Obama than anything they sent to congress last year. While the two frontrunners have changed positions on key conservative tenets daily, Paul has been spouting his unflinching rhetoric for decades." |
|
12-17-2011, 04:35 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
12-17-2011, 04:41 PM | #4 |
|
You are riding a dead horse, Jes. You have your mind made up. You're being rigid. That is of no intellectual value. Your rhetoric may have played when Paul was being ignored by the media and at the debates and wasn't raising piles of money. But now, if you open your eyes, you will see that he is raising millions and millions of dollars, polling in a statistical tie for first in Iowa, just had the most airtime to date in a debate this past Thursday, and is plastered all over TV and the internet. You can stubbornly deny these facts, but you can't intelligently or honestly deny these facts. I have to wonder why you even bother posting on the subject. Denying reality does not make one loved or respected in most settings. |
|
12-17-2011, 05:40 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
12-17-2011, 05:41 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
12-17-2011, 05:42 PM | #7 |
|
http://youtu.be/6aLlMIZr48k ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ THE BEEPY BEATBOX PEEPLE WILL NEVER VOTE FOR AN OLD WHITE MAN. THEY WANT THEIR COLLEGE LOANS AND THEIR FREE HOUSES. |
|
12-17-2011, 05:47 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
12-17-2011, 05:49 PM | #9 |
|
|
|
12-17-2011, 05:51 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
12-17-2011, 05:51 PM | #11 |
|
|
|
12-17-2011, 05:58 PM | #14 |
|
I don't think Paul can win.. There is plenty of time, after the primaries are over, to deal with the rest of this stuff. |
|
12-17-2011, 06:07 PM | #16 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|