[Maphpseurse]

The point is to keep the country safe and secure.

Can anyone tell me how we would be less safe or secure if we ended the wars and the meddling in the Middle East?

Can anyone actually explain it?

[Tainlyferfara]

We should follow the example of Switzerland.

[buyviagraonlineusatoday]

We should follow the example of Switzerland.

I agree.

[Senasivar]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH BANKERS OR MOUNTAINS TO DO THAT.

[bribiaLaubysdggf]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH BANKERS OR MOUNTAINS TO DO THAT.

We have too many bankers, and too many mountains. Enough of them to make SU blush.

[lisualsethelp]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OUR SANHEDRIN MAKES SATAN BLUSH.

[JNancy46]

The point is to keep the country safe and secure.

Can anyone tell me how we would be less safe or secure if we ended the wars and the meddling in the Middle East?

Can anyone actually explain it?

I wonder if you believe that safety and security may be defined in financial terms.

[SpeavaJap]

We should follow the example of Switzerland.

Switzerland?

The Switzerland surrounded by Nazi's in WW2 or the Switzerland surrounded by socialists today...?

[Extinimot]

I wonder if you believe that safety and security may be defined in financial terms.

It could be. Natural resources are what makes the world turn. Fortunately for the USA, we have some of the world's largest reserves of coal, oil, gas, timber, limestone, and fresh water, and also have working relationships with nations here in the western hemisphere who also have massive amounts of these resources.

[SonicPs]

It could be. Natural resources are what makes the world turn. Fortunately for the USA, we have some of the world's largest reserves of coal, oil, gas, timber, limestone, and fresh water, and also have working relationships with nations here in the western hemisphere who also have massive amounts of these resources.

I think it's that they're finite that's the point.

To me, foreign policy is always about advantage, rather than humanitarian interest.

[xjNo4zvD]

I think it's that they're finite that's the point.

To me, foreign policy is always about advantage, rather than humanitarian interest.

Sure. I have no interest in gov't sponsored humanitarianism.

No one has been able to make the case, to me, that current American foreign policy is to our advantage.

[*Playergirl*]

Sure. I have no interest in gov't sponsored humanitarianism.

No one has been able to make the case, to me, that current American foreign policy is to our advantage.

Someone thinks they're getting something out of it.

[Vznvtthq]

Someone thinks they're getting something out of it.

Without a doubt, someone is. The question is to whether the American people are.

[codespokerbonus]

If allowed, Muhammadians will gain as much global power as possible..
That cant stand...when it comes to nukes or cultural destruction.

If a country launches a nuclear attack, its going to come from an Islamic nation !
There is no doubt of this !

[occurrini]

Without a doubt, someone is. The question is to whether the American people are.

People keep saying oil, but look at the gas prices. What the American people get ? War debt, dead soldiers, people pissed at us, and threats of terror. That is ME foreign policy. Other foreign policy ? The Panama Canal, that's one. I am trying to think of others...

[Muhabsssa]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


WHAT ABOUT HYDROGEN CYANIDE.... IS IT STABLE OVER LONG PERIODS?

WILL IT BURN?

DOES IT LEAVE PERSISTENT UNIQUE RESIDUES?

[bingookenoo]

CHINA IS ROLLING UP THE OIL CONCESSIONS.

[portoskins]

CHINA IS ROLLING UP THE OIL CONCESSIONS.

And England.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/globa...ore-war/36813/


"Saddam Hussein first nationalized Iraq's oil industry in 1972. BP bought the development rights to Iraq's Rumalia field at auction in June 2009. That December, Shell secured a 20-year-contract to develop the Majnoon field."