DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Rtebydou** · 05-24-2010, 01:25 AM

Originally Posted by JohnQPublic Do you see Larouche and Celente more as agents of the same Jewish conspiracies?

Thoughts?

i talked to Chaitkin, LaRouche's history editor who is among other things a good history editor.

Chaitkin was feeding out disinfo that Zell Miller was going to stand with Alcee Hastings to stop the coronation of Bush43.

there's a legal procedure in our government where a Representative and a Senator can challenge an elector count, and raise all sorts of hell to make sure the votes are counted. Alcee Hastings from Florida stood for this and they needed a Senator.

anyway, based on those conversations, not just about Zell Miller but also about his biography, which writes the history of George HW Bush without saying a word about Israel, for sure Chaitkin behaves as if he represents Israel.

i haven't studied LaRouche enough. he went to jail for something minor, members of the Klub usually don't get sent to jail for little things.

one thing that LaRouche does is in his writing is to attribute the world's tribulations to British royalty, without mentioning Rothschild - or Israel. LaRouche acts in a manner that protects Israel. I read the Unauthorized Biography of George Bush. Overall it was a pretty powerful work. It seemed to provide evidence that Prescott Bush signed the bank papers at Union Bank of NY that released funds to the National Socialist Party allowing them to take over Germany.

I was also in Washington DC at the convention when Larouche made his first appearance after being released from jail. I was being recruited by the Larouche organization, and was told it would be really worth attending (I asked if he would be there, they could not say, and he ended up being there) . It was interesting. This occured at a period of time where I really started to understand that things were going very wrong in our country and the world. Larouche was the only publicly accessible figure at the time (that I could find) that actually seemed to have something substantial to say. What I did not like is that they were always right, and there was no other way.

I looked a Libertarianism, and even spent a lot of time talking to a local Libertarian candidate. The ideology was very simple to follow (government bad and inefficient, private markets good and efficient, society can exist without law and order- will police itself, Use shame, the Irish did it, etc., etc.). I felt it was too simple. I still think there may some good ideas in the "moderate wing" of the Libertarian party (i.e., those who call for strict adhrerence to the constitution like Ron Paul), but I think other parties may represent that better (LLike the American Constitutional Partybut they are not powerful enough to do anything).

05-24-2010, 01:25 AM	#27
Rtebydou Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 469 Senior Member	Originally Posted by JohnQPublic Do you see Larouche and Celente more as agents of the same Jewish conspiracies? Thoughts? i talked to Chaitkin, LaRouche's history editor who is among other things a good history editor. Chaitkin was feeding out disinfo that Zell Miller was going to stand with Alcee Hastings to stop the coronation of Bush43. there's a legal procedure in our government where a Representative and a Senator can challenge an elector count, and raise all sorts of hell to make sure the votes are counted. Alcee Hastings from Florida stood for this and they needed a Senator. anyway, based on those conversations, not just about Zell Miller but also about his biography, which writes the history of George HW Bush without saying a word about Israel, for sure Chaitkin behaves as if he represents Israel. i haven't studied LaRouche enough. he went to jail for something minor, members of the Klub usually don't get sent to jail for little things. one thing that LaRouche does is in his writing is to attribute the world's tribulations to British royalty, without mentioning Rothschild - or Israel. LaRouche acts in a manner that protects Israel. I read the Unauthorized Biography of George Bush. Overall it was a pretty powerful work. It seemed to provide evidence that Prescott Bush signed the bank papers at Union Bank of NY that released funds to the National Socialist Party allowing them to take over Germany. I was also in Washington DC at the convention when Larouche made his first appearance after being released from jail. I was being recruited by the Larouche organization, and was told it would be really worth attending (I asked if he would be there, they could not say, and he ended up being there) . It was interesting. This occured at a period of time where I really started to understand that things were going very wrong in our country and the world. Larouche was the only publicly accessible figure at the time (that I could find) that actually seemed to have something substantial to say. What I did not like is that they were always right, and there was no other way. I looked a Libertarianism, and even spent a lot of time talking to a local Libertarian candidate. The ideology was very simple to follow (government bad and inefficient, private markets good and efficient, society can exist without law and order- will police itself, Use shame, the Irish did it, etc., etc.). I felt it was too simple. I still think there may some good ideas in the "moderate wing" of the Libertarian party (i.e., those who call for strict adhrerence to the constitution like Ron Paul), but I think other parties may represent that better (LLike the American Constitutional Partybut they are not powerful enough to do anything).
	Quote