DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - F-35 Stealth Fighter Cover-Up

**AlexanderPalamayr** · 11-08-2010, 06:50 PM

http://redactednews.blogspot.com/201...-leak-and.html ... “Another spy disaster like Pollard, shoved under the rug too long due to pressure from the powerful Israeli lobby.”
On April 21, 2009, the Department of Defense announced the theft of 1.5 terabytes of data on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the platform meant give the United States and her allies air superiority for the next 40 years. In a flash, all that was gone, $300 billion dollars of funding down the drain, every system, defense, offense, stealth, everything needed to build one or shoot it down, all gone. Day one, China was accused but it wasn’t China, it wasn’t Iran, it wasn’t Pakistan. The theft left a clear signature, one identical to the data Wikileaks has been receiving, sources inside the Pentagon repeating the actions of Israeli-Soviet spy, Jonathan Pollard. As vital as the F-35 is to America’s defense, Pollard’s triumph on behalf of Soviet Russia and Israel dwarfs the current espionage coup.
Since the 2009 announcement, there has been nothing but silence.

the article isn't clear. yes, Pollard is one example of spying - but i'm not sure what Pollard has to do with the F35 theft.

as far as "who did it", Israel has the most access, as JSF contractors such as prime contractor Lockheed and subprimes such as Harris Corp & Northrop Grumman are FILLED with both Christian & Jewish Zionists.

my experience at contractors such as Northrop Grumman & Litton is that being a Zionist is basically a pre-requisite for any management position. you must cheerfully support the war-toy-boyz.

the theft of 1.5 Terabytes doesn't make the JSF useless - it's not a $300 billion loss, as the article states.

it's an indeterminate loss - but i guess that doesn't make a good headline.

how useful the information is depends on who has access to it and their level of technical understanding and their ability to manufacture parts from the drawings.

interesting, though. kind of raises more questions that it answers.

11-08-2010, 06:50 PM	#2
AlexanderPalamayr Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 498 Senior Member	http://redactednews.blogspot.com/201...-leak-and.html ... “Another spy disaster like Pollard, shoved under the rug too long due to pressure from the powerful Israeli lobby.” On April 21, 2009, the Department of Defense announced the theft of 1.5 terabytes of data on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the platform meant give the United States and her allies air superiority for the next 40 years. In a flash, all that was gone, $300 billion dollars of funding down the drain, every system, defense, offense, stealth, everything needed to build one or shoot it down, all gone. Day one, China was accused but it wasn’t China, it wasn’t Iran, it wasn’t Pakistan. The theft left a clear signature, one identical to the data Wikileaks has been receiving, sources inside the Pentagon repeating the actions of Israeli-Soviet spy, Jonathan Pollard. As vital as the F-35 is to America’s defense, Pollard’s triumph on behalf of Soviet Russia and Israel dwarfs the current espionage coup. Since the 2009 announcement, there has been nothing but silence. the article isn't clear. yes, Pollard is one example of spying - but i'm not sure what Pollard has to do with the F35 theft. as far as "who did it", Israel has the most access, as JSF contractors such as prime contractor Lockheed and subprimes such as Harris Corp & Northrop Grumman are FILLED with both Christian & Jewish Zionists. my experience at contractors such as Northrop Grumman & Litton is that being a Zionist is basically a pre-requisite for any management position. you must cheerfully support the war-toy-boyz. the theft of 1.5 Terabytes doesn't make the JSF useless - it's not a $300 billion loss, as the article states. it's an indeterminate loss - but i guess that doesn't make a good headline. how useful the information is depends on who has access to it and their level of technical understanding and their ability to manufacture parts from the drawings. interesting, though. kind of raises more questions that it answers.
	Quote