DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Zfdeisde** · 09-25-2012, 09:01 AM

#2 Wouldn't it be called casual water? Water is not an unnatural substance. If there is water and its not marked as a hazard it is casual water. The procedure for relief is the same as an immovable obstruction.

Based on his question's wording and the fact that there weren't any hazard stakes marking the water (and the implication that there should have been), I don't think the water in question is casual water, but a body of water instead that just wasn't marked by hazard stakes.

09-25-2012, 09:01 AM	#9
Zfdeisde Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 420 Senior Member	#2 Wouldn't it be called casual water? Water is not an unnatural substance. If there is water and its not marked as a hazard it is casual water. The procedure for relief is the same as an immovable obstruction. Based on his question's wording and the fact that there weren't any hazard stakes marking the water (and the implication that there should have been), I don't think the water in question is casual water, but a body of water instead that just wasn't marked by hazard stakes.
	Quote