DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ljq0AYOV** · 06-24-2012, 01:26 PM

That's a damned shame, but the 'airsoft' side of it wasn't really that relevant, was it? Typical 'sensationalist' reporting!

I really don't get this Police hassle thing - the owners should use them in a responsible manner and the Police should consider them real firearms until it's confirmed they are not.
IIRC, some of this is because some crooks (AKA idiots) used SA 'guns' in bank and other robberies and the public were concerned that the robbers got shot when they weren't 'real'. IMO, shoot them and check later!

06-24-2012, 01:26 PM	#6
ljq0AYOV Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 453 Senior Member	That's a damned shame, but the 'airsoft' side of it wasn't really that relevant, was it? Typical 'sensationalist' reporting! I really don't get this Police hassle thing - the owners should use them in a responsible manner and the Police should consider them real firearms until it's confirmed they are not. IIRC, some of this is because some crooks (AKA idiots) used SA 'guns' in bank and other robberies and the public were concerned that the robbers got shot when they weren't 'real'. IMO, shoot them and check later!
	Quote