DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**QXCharles** · 04-12-2011, 08:02 PM

I have it on good authority that the answer would be yes...but we don’t need players like that at SFFC who are solely it seems, playing for $$$...pride in playing for the jumper should be 1st... Hams obviously won’t be doing that at Swans, he'll be playing for the coin alone...

Nah fair point SFFC4ever, open honesty is what South Fremantle deserve and the way he did it might seem sneaky but he left South because he said things were "stale." Even if South matched Swans big paycheque, do you think he would still be at the club?

04-12-2011, 08:02 PM	#8
QXCharles Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 457 Senior Member	I have it on good authority that the answer would be yes...but we don’t need players like that at SFFC who are solely it seems, playing for $$$...pride in playing for the jumper should be 1st... Hams obviously won’t be doing that at Swans, he'll be playing for the coin alone... Nah fair point SFFC4ever, open honesty is what South Fremantle deserve and the way he did it might seem sneaky but he left South because he said things were "stale." Even if South matched Swans big paycheque, do you think he would still be at the club?
	Quote