DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**diseeKeythilt** · 07-13-2010, 06:57 PM

The burden of proof is not on athiests though.

I dont feel there is a burden of proof on either party, as their would be in a scientific debate. neither position is proveable, by any ways or means.

At the end of the day if the atheists are right then 'grats dude' you backed the right horse. youre still going to oblivion. If you follow the ideals and precedents of a compassionate religion and that was the right horse to back....what have you lost by being an upstanding citizen all your life

07-13-2010, 06:57 PM	#21
diseeKeythilt Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 497 Senior Member	The burden of proof is not on athiests though. I dont feel there is a burden of proof on either party, as their would be in a scientific debate. neither position is proveable, by any ways or means. At the end of the day if the atheists are right then 'grats dude' you backed the right horse. youre still going to oblivion. If you follow the ideals and precedents of a compassionate religion and that was the right horse to back....what have you lost by being an upstanding citizen all your life
	Quote